Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297169›Full record

Observational studyColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2022

The use of the faecal immunochemical test during the COVID-19 pandemic to triage urgent colorectal cancer referrals.

Faddy Kamel, Saadia Zulfiqar, WIlliam Penfold, Stephanie Weatherell, Rana Madani, Pasha Nisar, Philip Bearn

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The use of the faecal immunochemical test during the COVID-19 pandemic to triage urgent colorectal cancer referrals.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faddy KamelDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
Saadia ZulfiqarDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
WIlliam PenfoldDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
Stephanie WeatherellDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
Rana MadaniDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
Pasha NisarDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
Philip BearnDepartment of colorectal surgery, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Trust, Chertsey, UK.
Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, elective gastrointestinal endoscopy services were abbreviated for fear of viral transmission. However, urgent suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) referrals continued. Serendipitously, a national study suggested that a new faecal immunochemical test (FIT) might be helpful in triaging patients with colorectal alarm symptoms.

methodsThis was a single centre observational study of patients referred using NG12 criteria between March and August 2020. Patients were triaged to the urgent cancer pathway for FIT ≥ 10 μg/g and investigated using the latest National Health Service England guidance. Demographic data, method of investigations, cancer and polyp detection rates were compared to patients referred in the 6 months prior to the use of FIT as a triage tool.

resultsIn all, 1192 patients (median age 70) were referred using NG12 guidelines during the pandemic period, compared with 1592 patients (median age 72) in the previous 6 months. CRC detection was similar in both groups (n = 45, 2.8% vs. n = 38, 3.5%; P = 0.248). Two patients with a negative FIT (0.36%) had CRC. Using FIT as a triage tool resulted in a significant reduction in the use of endoscopy (n = 477, 43.6% vs. n = 1186, 74.5%; P > 0.001) with a significant increase in CT scanning (n = 696, 63.6% vs. n = 750, 47.1%; P < 0.001).

conclusionThe use of FIT in NG12 patients triaged during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced endoscopy but not CT scanning and did not compromise CRC detection rates. It is a safe method that aids in reducing the burden on services greatly. A negative FIT test does not absolutely exclude CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19AgedColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFecesHemoglobinsHumansOccult BloodPandemicsReferral and ConsultationSensitivity and SpecificityState MedicineTriageHemoglobinscolorectal cancerFIT screeningurgent suspected cancer triage

Identifiers

PMID35297169
PMCPMC9111478
OpenAlexW4220808416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.