Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297050›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Rising CO

Ning Dong, Ian J Wright, Jing M Chen, Xiangzhong Luo, Han Wang, Trevor F Keenan, Nicholas G Smith, Iain Colin Prentice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ning DongDepartment of Life Sciences, Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0793-8854
Ian J WrightDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-9143
Jing M ChenDepartment of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, 100 George Street, Toronto, ON, MS5 3G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8682-1293
Xiangzhong LuoDepartment of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, Singapore, 117570, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-0960
Han WangDepartment of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-1818
Trevor F KeenanDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3347-0258
Nicholas G SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-4387
Iain Colin PrenticeDepartment of Life Sciences, Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1296-6764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) limitation has been considered as a constraint on terrestrial carbon uptake in response to rising CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideNitrogenChlorophyllPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesCarbon DioxideChlorophyllNitrogenacclimationCO2 fertilizationcoordination hypothesisleaf chlorophyllnitrogen cyclenitrogen demandphotosynthetic capacityremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID35297050
PMCPMC9545159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.