Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297013›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Audio-Tokens: A toolbox for rating, sorting and comparing audio samples in the browser.

Peter W Donhauser, Denise Klein

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter W DonhauserCognitive Neuroscience Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada. peter.donhauser@esi-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2690-1478
Denise KleinCognitive Neuroscience Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada. denise.klein@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we describe a JavaScript toolbox to perform online rating studies with auditory material. The main feature of the toolbox is that audio samples are associated with visual tokens on the screen that control audio playback and can be manipulated depending on the type of rating. This allows the collection of single- and multidimensional feature ratings, as well as categorical and similarity ratings. The toolbox ( github.com/pwdonh/audio_tokens ) can be used via a plugin for the widely used jsPsych, as well as using plain JavaScript for custom applications. We expect the toolbox to be useful in psychological research on speech and music perception, as well as for the curation and annotation of datasets in machine learning.

Indexed as

Auditory perceptionJavaScriptOnline experimentsRating

Identifiers

PMID35297013
PMCPMC10027774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.