ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
Classification of Ear Imagery Database using Bayesian Optimization based on CNN-LSTM Architecture.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design optimization of university ideological and political education system based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Insight into Automatic Image Diagnosis of Ear Conditions Based on Optimized Deep Learning Approach.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Otitis Media with Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Analysis of RNA-seq Data for Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction of Colon Cancer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The external and middle ear conditions are diagnosed using a digital otoscope. The clinical diagnosis of ear conditions is suffered from restricted accuracy due to the increased dependency on otolaryngologist expertise, patient complaint, blurring of the otoscopic images, and complexity of lesions definition. There is a high requirement for improved diagnosis algorithms based on otoscopic image processing. This paper presented an ear diagnosis approach based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) as feature extraction and long short-term memory (LSTM) as a classifier algorithm. However, the suggested LSTM model accuracy may be decreased by the omission of a hyperparameter tuning process. Therefore, Bayesian optimization is used for selecting the hyperparameters to improve the results of the LSTM network to obtain a good classification. This study is based on an ear imagery database that consists of four categories: normal, myringosclerosis, earwax plug, and chronic otitis media (COM). This study used 880 otoscopic images divided into 792 training images and 88 testing images to evaluate the approach performance. In this paper, the evaluation metrics of ear condition classification are based on a percentage of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). The findings yielded a classification accuracy of 100%, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, and a PPV of 100% for the testing database. Finally, the proposed approach shows how to find the best hyperparameters concerning the Bayesian optimization for reliable diagnosis of ear conditions under the consideration of LSTM architecture. This approach demonstrates that CNN-LSTM has higher performance and lower training time than CNN, which has not been used in previous studies for classifying ear diseases. Consequently, the usefulness and reliability of the proposed approach will create an automatic tool for improving the classification and prediction of various ear pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.