Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35296489›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Investigating the role and applicability of patient versions of guidelines in oncology and deriving recommendations for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions in Germany: protocol for multiphase study.

Monika Becker, Stefanie Bühn, Nora Meyer, Susanne Blödt, Günther Carl, Markus Follmann, Stefanie Frenz, Thomas Langer, Monika Nothacker, Nancy Santesso and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Monika BeckerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten / Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany monika.becker@uni-wh.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3569-321X
Stefanie BühnInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten / Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Nora MeyerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten / Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Susanne BlödtInstitute for Medical Knowledge Management c/o Philipps University Marburg, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany, Marburg / Berlin, Germany.
Günther CarlGerman Prostate Cancer Support Group, Bonn, Germany.
Markus FollmannOffice of the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO), c/o German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3790-5578
Stefanie FrenzFrauenselbsthilfe Krebs Bundesverband, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas LangerOffice of the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO), c/o German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Monika NothackerInstitute for Medical Knowledge Management c/o Philipps University Marburg, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany, Marburg / Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-7391
Nancy SantessoDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Corinna SchaeferGerman Agency for Quality in Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Dawid PieperInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten / Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEAssociation of the Scientific Medical Societies · DEGerman Cancer Society · DEBundesverband Glaukom-Selbsthilfe · DEGerman Agency for Quality in Medicine · DEImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO) has published patient versions of clinical practice guidelines for more than 10 years. However, a systematic evaluation of these is lacking. The project aims to investigate the role and applicability of patient versions by considering the perspectives of experts, patients and healthcare providers to derive recommendations for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions in Germany. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project comprises two main modules. In module 1, we will first obtain information on methods and approaches for the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions by conducting systematic searches in Medline and screening the websites of guideline organisations. We will include any articles, such as methodological or empirical reports, published in German or English since 2000, that address methodological aspects related to patient versions. Further, we will conduct 20 interviews with experts from international and German organisations who are involved in the development of patient versions. In module 2, we will first conduct interviews to explore patients and healthcare providers' perceptions of patient versions of the GGPO. For the group of patients and the group of healthcare providers, we aim to conduct 25 interviews each. Second, we will conduct focus groups, separately for breast, prostate and colon cancer. The recruitment of participants for the interviews and focus groups will primarily be done through a previous survey about patient versions in oncology. The results will be used to derive recommendations for enhancing the development, dissemination and implementation of patient versions by involving the relevant stakeholder groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the qualitative parts of the project was given by the Ethics Committee of Witten/Herdecke University (number 160/2021). Participants will be required to provide informed consent. The project findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyGermanyGuidelines as TopicHumansMalePatient Education as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topiconcologyprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35296489
PMCPMC8928290
OpenAlexW4220781568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.