Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35296311›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

Identification and characterisation of spontaneous mutations causing deafness from a targeted knockout programme.

Morag A Lewis, Neil J Ingham, Jing Chen, Selina Pearson, Francesca Di Domenico, Sohinder Rekhi, Rochelle Allen, Matthew Drake, Annelore Willaert, Victoria Rook and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Morag A LewisWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England. Morag.lewis@kcl.ac.uk.
Neil J InghamWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Jing ChenWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Selina PearsonWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, England.
Francesca Di DomenicoWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Sohinder RekhiWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Rochelle AllenWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Matthew DrakeWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Annelore WillaertResearch Group of Experimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Victoria RookWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Johanna PassWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
Thomas KeaneWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, England.
David J AdamsWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, England.
Abigail S TuckerCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, England.
Jacqueline K WhiteWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, England.
Karen P SteelWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, England.
King's College London · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M000281/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M02069X/1Medical Research Council G0300212Medical Research Council MC_qA137918Medical Research Council MR/L007428/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust 100699Wellcome Trust 102889/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMice carrying targeted mutations are important for investigating gene function and the role of genes in disease, but off-target mutagenic effects associated with the processes of generating targeted alleles, for instance using Crispr, and culturing embryonic stem cells, offer opportunities for spontaneous mutations to arise. Identifying spontaneous mutations relies on the detection of phenotypes segregating independently of targeted alleles, and having a broad estimate of the level of mutations generated by intensive breeding programmes is difficult given that many phenotypes are easy to miss if not specifically looked for. Here we present data from a large, targeted knockout programme in which mice were analysed through a phenotyping pipeline. Such spontaneous mutations segregating within mutant lines may confound phenotypic analyses, highlighting the importance of record-keeping and maintaining correct pedigrees.

resultsTwenty-five lines out of 1311 displayed different deafness phenotypes that did not segregate with the targeted allele. We observed a variety of phenotypes by Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and behavioural assessment and isolated eight lines showing early-onset severe progressive hearing loss, later-onset progressive hearing loss, low frequency hearing loss, or complete deafness, with vestibular dysfunction. The causative mutations identified include deletions, insertions, and point mutations, some of which involve new genes not previously associated with deafness while others are new alleles of genes known to underlie hearing loss. Two of the latter show a phenotype much reduced in severity compared to other mutant alleles of the same gene. We investigated the ES cells from which these lines were derived and determined that only one of the 8 mutations could have arisen in the ES cell, and in that case, only after targeting. Instead, most of the non-segregating mutations appear to have occurred during breeding of mutant mice. In one case, the mutation arose within the wildtype colony used for expanding mutant lines.

conclusionsOur data show that spontaneous mutations with observable effects on phenotype are a common side effect of intensive breeding programmes, including those underlying targeted mutation programmes. Such spontaneous mutations segregating within mutant lines may confound phenotypic analyses, highlighting the importance of record-keeping and maintaining correct pedigrees.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearing LossAllelesAnimalsMiceMutagenesisMutationDeafnessLarge-scale mutagenesis programmeNon-segregating phenotypesProgressive hearing lossSpontaneous mutations

Identifiers

PMID35296311
PMCPMC8928630
OpenAlexW4221087004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.