Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35296299›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Reproducibility of improvements in patient-reported functional ability following functional capacity evaluation.

Martin Schindl, Harald Zipko, Matthias Bethge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin SchindlRehab Center Weißer Hof, AUVA, Holzgasse 350, Klosterneuburg , A-3400, Austria. martin.schindl@auva.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-9011
Harald ZipkoFH Campus Wien, Favoritenstrasse 226, Wien, 1100, Austria.
Matthias BethgeInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6417-7812
Hochschule Campus Wien · ATThe American University of Vietnam · VNUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerformance of functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may affect patients, self-efficacy to complete physical activity tasks. First evidence from a diagnostic before-after study indicates a significant increase of patient-reported functional ability. Our study set out to test the reproducibility of these results.

methodsPatients with musculoskeletal trauma and an unclear return to work prognosis were recruited in a trauma rehabilitation center in Lower Austria. We included patient cohorts of three consecutive years (2016: n = 161, 2017: n = 140; 2018: n = 151). Our primary outcome was patient-reported functional ability, measured using the Spinal Function Sort (SFS). SFS scores were assessed before and after performing an FCE to describe the change in patient-reported functional ability (cohort study). We investigated whether the change in SFS scores observed after performing an FCE in our first cohort could be replicated in subsequent cohorts.

resultsDemographic data (gender, age and time after trauma) did not differ significantly between the three patient cohorts. Correlation analysis showed highly associated before and after SFS scores in each cohort (2016: r

conclusionsA significant increase in patient-reported functional ability after FCE was found in the original study and the results could be reproduced in two subsequent cohorts.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesWork Capacity EvaluationCohort StudiesHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresReproducibility of ResultsCohort studyDiagnosticFunctional capacity evaluationRehabilitationReplicationReproducibilityReturn to workTrauma

Identifiers

PMID35296299
PMCPMC8928652
OpenAlexW4221011497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.