Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35296009›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The Prognoses of Young Women With Breast Cancer (≤35 years) With Different Surgical Options: A Propensity Score Matching Retrospective Cohort Study.

Pei Li, Lun Li, Bingqiu Xiu, Liyi Zhang, Benlong Yang, Yayun Chi, Jingyan Xue, Jiong Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05708664 (Precision Breast Conserving Surgery With the Guidance of Localization Combined With Multidetector CT 3-dimensional Image Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05708664 nacompletednot on this map

Precision Breast Conserving Surgery With the Guidance of Localization Combined With Multidetector CT 3-dimensional Image Reconstruction: a Single Center, Prospective, Cohort Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled92ConditionsBreast CancerArmsprecision breast conserving surgery guided by wire guided localization combined with MDCT guided 3D reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pei LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Lun LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Cancer South China, Changsha, China.
Bingqiu XiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Liyi ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Benlong YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Yayun ChiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jingyan XueDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jiong WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Compared with older patients, young women with breast cancer (YWBCs) have a poorer prognosis and a higher risk of recurrence. Ages ≤35 years are independent risk factors for local recurrence of breast cancer. Surgery is the most important local treatment for YWBC, and there is still a lack of prospective studies comparing surgical options for recurrence and survival. We retrospectively compared the effects of surgical options on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of YWBC at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC). Methods: YWBCs (age ≤35 years) who underwent surgery at FUSCC between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups according to surgical options: 1) breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 2) mastectomy alone (M), and 3) mastectomy with reconstruction (RECON). The DFS and OS outcome rates from the three surgical options were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was also used to balance the baseline characteristics to eliminate selection bias. Results: A total of 1,520 YWBCs were enrolled with a median follow-up of 5.1 years, including 524 patients (34.5%) who underwent BCS, 676 patients (44.5%) who underwent M, and 320 patients (21.1%) who underwent RECON. The 5-year DFS rates were 96%, 87%, and 93%, respectively ( Conclusions: The surgical options were independent factors affecting DFS and OS in YWBC, and the DFS and OS rates were significantly improved in the BCS group compared to those in the M group. BCS is preferred for early YWBC, and RECON is the best option for remodeling the body images of YWBC who do not have breast-conserving conditions.

Indexed as

breast-conserving surgerypropensity score matchingsurgical optionssurvivalyoung breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID35296009
PMCPMC8919514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.