Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295959›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

The Effect of Position on Radiographic Angle Measurements of the Lower Extremities.

Jeehyeok Chung, Joonhee Lee, Hyuk-Soo Han, Myung Chul Lee, Du Hyun Ro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Consensus statement on the application of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis screening and management: perspectives from the Asia-Pacific region.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeehyeok ChungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4178-5225
Joonhee LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyuk-Soo HanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1229-8863
Myung Chul LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-1573
Du Hyun RoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-908X
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Accurately measuring an angle on a lower extremity X-ray is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, the angle is often affected by position, especially with flexion contracture and rotation. To date, there have been no quantitative analyses examining the relationship between lower extremity angle and patient position and no studies targeting patients with deformities. The aim of this study is to quantify the effect of position on angle measurements in lower extremity X-rays and to compare the effect in patients with different deformities. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) data of 131 patients with knee pain were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were categorized into the following groups: neutral (hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) between 175 and 185°), varus (HKAA less than 175°), valgus (HKAA more than 185°), and flexion (flexion contracture more than 10°). CT images were digitally reconstructed to anterior-posterior X-ray images using an average intensity projection algorithm. The process was then repeated while rotating the reconstruction plane from internal 9° to external 9°. In this manner, X-ray images were reconstructed in different rotational states. The following angles were measured from reconstructed X-ray images: HKAA, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and femoral valgus angle (FVA). The measurements were then compared according to the degree of rotation. Results: FVA significantly differed according to rotation in all groups ( Conclusions: Radiographic measurement of FVA is subject to change according to rotation. HKAA significantly changed only in the flexion contracture group, so more care should be taken while obtaining X-rays of patients with flexion contracture.

Indexed as

Patient PositioningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35295959
PMCPMC8920670
OpenAlexW4221133224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.