Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295903›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022

Pragmatic assessment of resident performed cardiac point of care ultrasound using a validated scoring metric.

Stuart B Prenner, Marietta Ambrose, Dipika J Gopal, Sina Manthey, Jenna Spears, Allison Sussman, Cameron Baston

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart B PrennerDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and Perelman School of Medicine. This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation. 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Marietta AmbroseDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and Perelman School of Medicine. This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation. 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Dipika J GopalKaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, This author takes responsibility for study design, data collection, and a critical revision of the manuscript. 6600 Bruceville Road, Sacramento, CA 95823, USA.
Sina MantheyMayo Clinic Florida. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, This author takes responsibility for study design, data collection, and a critical revision of the manuscript. 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Jenna SpearsLankenau Medical Center. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, This author takes responsibility for study design, data collection, and a critical revision of the manuscript. 100 E Lancaster Ave., Wynnewood, PA 19096, USA.
Allison SussmanDepartment of Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital. This author takes responsibility for study design, data collection, and a critical revision of the manuscript. 800 spruce street. Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Cameron BastonDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Medicine, Department of Medicine University of Pennsylvania and Perelman School of Medicine. This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation. 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USKaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center · USLankenau Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USPennsylvania Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized by trainees across various specialties and can rapidly assess the cardiac status of unstable patients. However, the quality of trainee performed cardiac examinations has been reported only in controlled studies. In this study we aimed to assess the quality of all cardiac POCUS performed by internal medicine trainees at a major academic medical center over a three-year period. Methods: 256 studies were included and were graded by experts blinded to postgraduate year (PGY) using a previously validated scoring metric. Results: We found significant improvement in overall quality of resident performed cardiac POCUS from PGY 1 to 3 (10.8, 10.2, 13.2, p = 0.012). Assessment of left ventricular function was possible in 82% of studies and increased from PGY 1 to PGY 3 (77%, 76%, 88%, p = 0.025). Similar trends were seen in the assessment of the pericardial space (67%, 71%, 84%, p = 0.012). Images sufficient for right ventricular and volume status assessment were less commonly found (65%, 60%, 75% and 60%, 49%, 57%, respectively). Conclusions: This study provides a real world experience of the level of diagnostic accuracy that can be expected from IM trainees with minimal hands-on supervision.

Indexed as

EchocardiogramIM, internal medicineIVC, inferior vena cavaLV, left ventricle: RV, right ventricleMedical educationPGY, post graduate yearPOCUSPOCUS, point of care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35295903
PMCPMC8919212
OpenAlexW4221126101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.