Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295900›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Comparing the longer-term effectiveness of a single dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines across the age spectrum.

Amit Kaura, Adam Trickey, Anoop S V Shah, Umberto Benedetto, Ben Glampson, Abdulrahim Mulla, Luca Mercuri, Sanjay Gautama, Ceire E Costelloe, Ian Goodman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epidemiologic and clinical updates on viral infections in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amit KauraHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Adam TrickeyPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anoop S V ShahHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Umberto BenedettoPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ben GlampsonHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Abdulrahim MullaHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Luca MercuriHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Sanjay GautamaNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ceire E CostelloeHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Ian GoodmanNorth West London Collaboration of Clinical Commissioning Groups and Whole Systems Integrated Care, London, UK.
Julian RedheadNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kavitha SaravanakumarNorth West London Collaboration of Clinical Commissioning Groups and Whole Systems Integrated Care, London, UK.
Erik MayerHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Jamil MayetHammersmith Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/18/34972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A single dose strategy may be adequate to confer population level immunity and protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, especially in low- and middle-income countries where vaccine supply remains limited. We compared the effectiveness of a single dose strategy of the Oxford-AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection across all age groups and over an extended follow-up period. Methods: Individuals vaccinated in North-West London, UK, with either the first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines between January 12, 2021 and March 09, 2021, were matched to each other by demographic and clinical characteristics. Each vaccinated individual was additionally matched to an unvaccinated control. Study outcomes included SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity, COVID-19 hospitalisation, COVID-19 death, and all-cause mortality. Findings: Amongst matched individuals, 63,608 were in each of the vaccine groups and 127,216 were unvaccinated. Between 14 and 84 days of follow-up after matching, there were 534 SARS-CoV-2 infections, 65 COVID-19 hospitalisations, and 190 deaths, of which 29 were categorized as due to COVID-19. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.05) for Oxford-Astra-Zeneca, and 0.69 (0.55 to 0.86) for Pfizer-BioNTech. The IRR for both vaccines was the same at 0.25 (0.09 to 0.55) and 0.14 (0.02 to 0.58) for reducing COVID-19 hospitalization and COVID-19 mortality, respectively. The IRR for all-cause mortality was 0.25 (0.15 to 0.39) and 0.18 (0.10 to 0.30) for the Oxford-Astra-Zeneca and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, respectively. Age was an effect modifier of the association between vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection of any severity; lower hazard ratios for increasing age. Interpretation: A single dose strategy, for both vaccines, was effective at reducing COVID-19 mortality and hospitalization rates. The magnitude of vaccine effectiveness was comparatively lower for SARS-CoV-2 infection, although this was variable across the age range, with higher effectiveness seen with older adults. Our results have important implications for health system planning -especially in low resource settings where vaccine supply remains constrained.

Indexed as

AgeCOVID-19HospitalisationMortalitySARS-CoV-2Vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35295900
PMCPMC8918854
OpenAlexW4220744774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.