Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295887›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

A new solid target design for the production of

Mukesh K Pandey, Aditya Bansal, Jason R Ellinghuysen, Daniel J Vail, Heather M Berg, Timothy R DeGrado

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimized production ofEJNMMI physics · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Pressed Solid Target Production ofCurrent radiopharmaceuticals · 2025
    Article
  4. EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of differentScientific reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mukesh K PandeyDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN 55906, USA.
Aditya BansalDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN 55906, USA.
Jason R EllinghuysenDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN 55906, USA.
Daniel J VailDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN 55906, USA.
Heather M BergDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN 55906, USA.
Timothy R DeGradoDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester MN 55906, USA.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the advent of various biologics like antibodies, proteins, cells, viruses, and extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for disease diagnosis, progression, and as therapeutics, there exists a need to have a simple and ready to use radiolabeling synthon to enable noninvasive imaging trafficking studies. Previously, we reported [

Indexed as

89Zr[89Zr]Zr-DBNantibody (IgG)cyclotron targetrysolid targetyttrium foil

Identifiers

PMID35295887
PMCPMC8918403
OpenAlexW4225995945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.