Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295840›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2022

Leveraging the Potential of Digital Technology for Better Individualized Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.

Holger Fröhlich, Noémi Bontridder, Dijana Petrovska-Delacréta, Enrico Glaab, Felix Kluge, Mounim El Yacoubi, Mayca Marín Valero, Jean-Christophe Corvol, Bjoern Eskofier, Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The neurologist of 2050: Rethinking the role in movement disorders in a technologically transformed society.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Digital Technologies for Symptom Monitoring in Parkinson Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Holger FröhlichDepartment of Bioinformatics, Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Noémi BontridderCentre de Recherches Information, Droit et Societe, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Dijana Petrovska-DelacrétaInstitut Polytechnique de Paris, Telecom SudParis, Evry, France.
Enrico GlaabLuxembourg Center for Systems Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch, Luxembourg.
Felix KlugeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Mounim El YacoubiInstitut Polytechnique de Paris, Telecom SudParis, Evry, France.
Mayca Marín ValeroAsociacion Parkinson Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jean-Christophe CorvolInstitut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.
Bjoern EskofierDepartment of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Jean-Marc Van GyseghemCentre de Recherches Information, Droit et Societe, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.
Stepháne LehericyInstitut du Cerveau (ICM), Paris, France.
Jürgen WinklerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Jochen KluckenLuxembourg Center for Systems Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch, Luxembourg.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEInstitut du Cerveau · FRInstitut Polytechnique de Paris · FRUniversity of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Namur · BEBonn Aachen International Center for Information Technology · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed a strongly increasing interest in digital technology within medicine (sensor devices, specific smartphone apps) and specifically also neurology. Quantitative measures derived from digital technology could provide Digital Biomarkers (DMs) enabling a quantitative and continuous monitoring of disease symptoms, also outside clinics. This includes the possibility to continuously and sensitively monitor the response to treatment, hence opening the opportunity to adapt medication pathways quickly. In addition, DMs may in the future allow early diagnosis, stratification of patient subgroups and prediction of clinical outcomes. Thus, DMs could complement or in certain cases even replace classical examiner-based outcome measures and molecular biomarkers measured in cerebral spinal fluid, blood, urine, saliva, or other body liquids. Altogether, DMs could play a prominent role in the emerging field of precision medicine. However, realizing this vision requires dedicated research. First, advanced data analytical methods need to be developed and applied, which extract candidate DMs from raw signals. Second, these candidate DMs need to be validated by (a) showing their correlation to established clinical outcome measures, and (b) demonstrating their diagnostic and/or prognostic value compared to established biomarkers. These points again require the use of advanced data analytical methods, including machine learning. In addition, the arising ethical, legal and social questions associated with the collection and processing of sensitive patient data and the use of machine learning methods to analyze these data for better individualized treatment of the disease, must be considered thoroughly. Using Parkinson's Disease (PD) as a prime example of a complex multifactorial disorder, the purpose of this article is to critically review the current state of research regarding the use of DMs, discuss open challenges and highlight emerging new directions.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencedigital biomarkerdigital healthParkinson's Diseaseprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID35295840
PMCPMC8918525
OpenAlexW4221068468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.