Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295794›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2022

The Concept, Development, and Application of a Home-Based High-Definition tDCS for Bilateral Motor Cortex Modulation in Migraine and Pain.

Alexandre F DaSilva, Abhishek Datta, Jaiti Swami, Dajung J Kim, Parag G Patil, Marom Bikson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. High-definition tDCS over primary motor cortex modulates brain signal variability and functional connectivity in episodic migraine.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre F DaSilvaHeadache and Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences and Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Abhishek DattaSoterix Medical Inc., New York, NY, United States.
Jaiti SwamiNeural Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Dajung J KimHeadache and Orofacial Pain Effort Lab, Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences and Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Parag G PatilDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Marom BiksonNeural Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USCity College of New York · USSoterix Medical (United States) · US

Funding

Investigation and Modulation of the Central Mu-Opioid Mechanism in Migraine (in vivo)R01NS094413 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALEXANDRE DASILVA · 2015 to 2026
$4.3M
Explosive Synchronization of Brain Network Activity in Chronic PainR01AT010060 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DASILVA, ALEXANDRE, HARRIS, RICHARD E · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Investigation and Modulation of the Mu-Opioid Mechanism in Chronic TMD (in vivo)U01DE025633 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DASILVA, ALEXANDRE · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
Brain as a Research and Therapeutic Target in Chronic TMDR56DE022637 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DASILVA, ALEXANDRE · 2013 to 2014
$773k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010060NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE022637NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE025633NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas, many debilitating chronic pain disorders are dominantly bilateral (e.g., fibromyalgia, chronic migraine), non-invasive and invasive cortical neuromodulation therapies predominantly apply unilateral stimulation. The development of excitatory stimulation targeting bilateral primary motor (M1) cortices could potentially expand its therapeutic effect to more global pain relief. However, this is hampered by increased procedural and technical complexity. For example, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 4 × 1/2 × 2 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (4 × 1/2 × 2 HD-tDCS) are largely center-based, with unilateral-target focus-bilateral excitation would require two rTMS/4 × 1 HD-tDCS systems. We developed a system that allows for focal, non-invasive, self-applied, and simultaneous bilateral excitatory M1 stimulation, supporting long-term home-based treatment with a well-tolerated wearable battery-powered device. Here, we overviewed the most employed M1 neuromodulation methods, from invasive techniques to non-invasive TMS and tDCS. The evaluation extended from non-invasive diffuse asymmetric bilateral (M1-supraorbital [SO] tDCS), non-invasive and invasive unilateral focal (4 × 1/2 × 2 HD-tDCS, rTMS, MCS), to non-invasive and invasive bilateral bipolar (M1-M1 tDCS, MCS), before outlining our proposal for a neuromodulatory system with unique features. Computational models were applied to compare brain current flow for current laboratory-based unilateral M1

Indexed as

bilateral stimulationchronic painhigh-definitionhome-basedM1 stimulationmigrainetDCS

Identifiers

PMID35295794
PMCPMC8915734
OpenAlexW4210439004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.