Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295780›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Serum NLRP3 Inflammasome and BDNF: Potential Biomarkers Differentiating Reactive and Endogenous Depression.

Xin-Jing Yang, Bing-Cong Zhao, Jing Li, Chuan Shi, Yu-Qing Song, Xing-Zhou Gao, Hui-Li Jiang, Qiu-Yun Yu, Xing-Chen Liang, Shi-Xing Feng and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Systemic Inflammation in Asthma: What Are the Risks and Impacts Outside the Airway?The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin-Jing YangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, South China Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Bing-Cong ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Acupuncture Neuromodulation, Acupuncture and Moxibustion Department, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing LiCenter on Aging Psychology Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chuan ShiPsychological Assessment Center, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yu-Qing SongInstitute of Mental Health, Peking University Sixth Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xing-Zhou GaoSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hui-Li JiangSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Qiu-Yun YuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xing-Chen LiangBei Tai Ping Zhuang Community Health Service Center, Beijing, China.
Shi-Xing FengDongfang Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiang LiSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yang SunSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ya-Huan LiSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yang-Peng WangCollege of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Tuya BaoSchool of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhang-Jin ZhangSchool of Chinese Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShenzhen University · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Sixth Hospital · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The highly heterogeneous pathogenesis of depression and limited response to current antidepressants call for more objective evidence for depression subtypes. Reactive and endogenous depression are two etiologically distinct subtypes associated with different treatment responses. This study aims to explore the potential biomarkers that differentiate reactive and endogenous depressions. Methods: The clinical manifestations and biological indicators of 64 unmedicated mild-to-moderate depression patients (32 reactive depression patients and 32 endogenous depression patients) and 21 healthy subjects were observed. The 24-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD-24) was used to evaluate the severity of depression. Serum levels of depression-related biological indicators were measured by using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The NLRP3 level of reactive depression was significantly lower than those of endogenous depression and healthy controls. There was a significant negative correlation between the BDNF level and the HAMD-24 total scores for patients with reactive depression. Conclusion: Our findings suggested the serum NLRP3 and BDNF levels could be potential biomarkers for detecting and evaluating the severity of reactive depression.

Indexed as

brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)endogenous depressionmild-to-moderate depressionNOD-like receptor family protein 3 (NLRP3)reactive depression

Identifiers

PMID35295780
PMCPMC8918660
OpenAlexW4214740707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.