Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295755›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Janne G Thöming, Susanne Häussler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. BioMed research international · 2026
    Review
  10. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Colistin resistance dynamics inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic and phenotypic characterisation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Janne G ThömingDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne HäusslerDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DERigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm-associated bacteria exhibit profound changes in bacterial physiology. They thrive in the environment but also in the human host in protected sessile communities. Antimicrobial therapy usually fails, despite the absence of genotypic resistance, and it is commonly accepted that biofilm-grown bacteria are up to 1,000-fold more resistant than planktonic cells. We are only at the beginning to understand the reasons for biofilm recalcitrance, and systematic approaches to describe biofilm-induced tolerance phenotypes are lacking. In this study, we investigated a large and highly diverse collection of 352 clinical

Indexed as

Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlanktonTobramycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsTobramycinantibiotic treatmentantimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)biofilm-associated chronic infectionsbiofilm-induced tolerancebiofilmsclinical isolatesconditional tolerancePseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35295755
PMCPMC8920030
OpenAlexW4214665800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.