Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295752›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2022

Insight from patients and healthcare professionals on the implementation of virtual clinics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Aditi Kumar, Mohammed Nabil Quraishi, Shanika de Silva, Nigel John Trudgill, Helen Steed, Matthew James Brookes, Rachel Cooney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the Experiences of Virtual Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care in Saskatchewan.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  2. Gastroenterology 2022: Groundhog Day.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aditi KumarGastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-3173
Mohammed Nabil QuraishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2338-8397
Shanika de SilvaGastroenterology, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.
Nigel John TrudgillGastroenterology, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, UK.
Helen SteedGastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK.
Matthew James BrookesGastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK.
Rachel CooneyDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Wolverhampton · GBDudley Group NHS Foundation Trust · GBSandwell General Hospital · GBThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: During COVID-19, the management of outpatient inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) changed from face-to-face (F2F) to telephone and video consultations across the UK. We surveyed patients with IBD and IBD healthcare professionals (HCPs) to evaluate the impact of this abrupt transition on patient and HCP satisfaction outcomes, including the barriers and enablers of this service. Methods: Patient satisfaction surveys were sent to patients who had a telephone consultation from May to July 2020. A second survey was sent to IBD HCPs across the UK. Questions from both surveys consisted of a mixture of multiple-choice options, ranking answers as well as short-answer questions. Results: 210 patients and 114 HCPs completed the survey. During COVID-19, there was a significantly greater use of telephone, video or a mixture of consultation. F2F consultations were consistently preferred by patients, with 50% of patients indicating they did not want the option of for video consultations. Patients were more likely to prefer a telephone consultation if they were stable and needed routine review. Significantly fewer HCPs (5.3%) intend to use F2F consultations alone, preferring the use of telephone (20.2%) or combinations of telephone/F2F (22.8%), telephone/video (4.4%) or combination of all three consultation types (34.2%). 63% indicated they intend to incorporate video consultations in the future. Conclusion: Telephone and video consultations need to be balanced proportionately with F2F clinics to achieve both patient and HCP satisfaction. Further research needs to be done to explore the use of video medicine in patients with IBD.

Indexed as

COVID-19inflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID35295752
PMCPMC8862460
OpenAlexW3133355752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.