Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Esophageal Diameter as a Function of Weight in Neonates, Children and Adolescents: Reference Values for Dilatation of Esophageal Stenoses.

Steffan Loff, Oliver Diez, Wei Ho, Thekla V Kalle, Svetlana Hetjens, Michael Boettcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steffan LoffKinderchirurgische Klinik, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Oliver DiezKinderchirurgische Klinik, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Wei HoKinderchirurgische Klinik, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Thekla V KalleRadiologisches Institut, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Svetlana HetjensMedizinische Statistik, Biomathematik und Informationsverarbeitung Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Michael BoettcherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal stenoses are frequent complications after esophageal atresia surgery as well as after acid, alkali and battery ingestion. Worldwide, repeated balloon dilatations are the most frequently performed procedures for these stenoses. In most cases the stenoses can be dilated sufficiently to allow adequate enteral nutrition. Until recently, age dependent esophageal lumen size has not been established; which was aim of the current study. Methods: All children in whom an esophageal contrast imaging was performed between 1/2011 and 5/2021 were included. The width was measured by two investigators at two measuring points in two planes, the diameter was calculated and plotted against the respective weight of the child. Bland-Altmann plots have confirmed the validity of the measurements of both investigators. Results: Esophagus diameter was measured in more than 100 children. The resulting curves show a very good correlation with weight (upper measuring point: Conclusion: These results are the first to define the esophageal diameter in children. The results of this study may guide physicians performing esophageal interventions including dilatations in future.

Indexed as

burn of esophagusdiameter of normal esophagusdilatationesophageal atresiaesophageal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID35295699
PMCPMC8918730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.