Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295486›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2021

Chronic Migraine Pathophysiology and Treatment: A Review of Current Perspectives.

Tiffani J Mungoven, Luke A Henderson, Noemi Meylakh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06109389 (The Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Chronic Unilateral Migraine Headache Clinical and Laboratory Assessment .Aprospective Randomized Double Blind Controlled Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06109389 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion in Chronic Unilateral Migraine Headache Clinical and Laboratory Assessment .Aprospective Randomized Double Blind Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsChronic Migraine, HeadacheArmsLidocaine IV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Beyond the headache: autonomic reflex dysfunction and heightened sensory sensitivity contribute to orthostatic intolerance in migraine.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tiffani J MungovenDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Luke A HendersonDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Noemi MeylakhDepartment of Anatomy and Histology, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic migraine is a disabling neurological disorder that imposes a considerable burden on individual and socioeconomic outcomes. Chronic migraine is defined as headaches occurring on at least 15 days per month with at least eight of these fulfilling the criteria for migraine. Chronic migraine typically evolves from episodic migraine as a result of increasing attack frequency and/or several other risk factors that have been implicated with migraine chronification. Despite this evolution, chronic migraine likely develops into its own distinct clinical entity, with unique features and pathophysiology separating it from episodic migraine. Furthermore, chronic migraine is characterized with higher disability and incidence of comorbidities in comparison to episodic migraine. While existing migraine studies primarily focus on episodic migraine, less is known about chronic migraine pathophysiology. Mounting evidence on aberrant alterations suggest that pronounced functional and structural brain changes, central sensitization and neuroinflammation may underlie chronic migraine mechanisms. Current treatment options for chronic migraine include risk factor modification, acute and prophylactic therapies, evidence-based treatments such as onabotulinumtoxinA, topiramate and newly approved calcitonin gene-related peptide or receptor targeted monoclonal antibodies. Unfortunately, treatments are still predominantly ineffective in aborting migraine attacks and decreasing intensity and frequency, and poor adherence and compliance with preventative medications remains a significant challenge. Novel emerging chronic migraine treatments such as neuromodulation offer promising therapeutic approaches that warrant further investigation. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an update of current knowledge and perspectives regarding chronic migraine background, pathophysiology, current and emerging treatment options with the intention of facilitating future research into this debilitating and largely indeterminant disorder.

Indexed as

CGRPfunctional connectivityhypothalamusperiaqueductal grayspinal trigeminal nucleustrigeminal nerve

Identifiers

PMID35295486
PMCPMC8915760
OpenAlexW3195880321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.