Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295406›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2022

Wear Behavior of Different Generations of Zirconia: Present Literature.

Kuljirarnat Jitwirachot, Pimduen Rungsiyakull, Julie A Holloway, Wissanee Jia-Mahasap

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Chemical Solubility of 2.3Y-TZP Dental Ceramics.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kuljirarnat JitwirachotDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pimduen RungsiyakullDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7497-6618
Julie A HollowayDepartment of Prosthodontics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Wissanee Jia-MahasapDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7780-4072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The wear behavior of the novel zirconia generation is less well understood and may be affected by compositional modifications compared to the conventional zirconia. Materials and Methods: Combinations of keywords such as "zirconia," "high translucent," and "wear" were searched in PubMed and Google Scholar databases up to May 2021. The total of 23 relevant articles was selected according to inclusion criteria. Results: Reports show comparable wear resistance of translucent zirconia to the conventional zirconia despite an increased cubic phase content and lower mean flexural strength. A meticulously polished surface creates the lowest surface roughness, producing favorable zirconia wear resistance and antagonist wear compared to a glazed surface. In comparison to other ceramic materials, zirconia produces the least wear on an enamel antagonist and almost undetectable wear when opposed by zirconia. Wear when paired against resin materials yields a favorable outcome, whereas wear behavior against a metal antagonist varies with the surface hardness of the metal. Conclusions: All zirconia generations are considered wear-friendly to all types of antagonists. Nonetheless, comparative studies on antagonist wear opposing zirconia of different compositions are still limited and further investigation is required.

Identifiers

PMID35295406
PMCPMC8920625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.