Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Involving Older Adults During COVID-19 Restrictions in Developing an Ecosystem Supporting Active Aging: Overview of Alternative Elicitation Methods and Common Requirements From Five European Countries.

Kerli Mooses, Mariana Camacho, Filippo Cavallo, Michael David Burnard, Carina Dantas, Grazia D'Onofrio, Adriano Fernandes, Laura Fiorini, Ana Gama, Ana Perandrés Gómez and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kerli MoosesInstitute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mariana CamachoDepartment of Innovation, Santa Casa da Misericórdia da Amadora (SCMA), Amadora, Portugal.
Filippo CavalloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Michael David BurnardInnoRenew CoE, Izola, Slovenia.
Carina DantasCáritas Diocesana de Coimbra (CDC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Grazia D'OnofrioComplex Unit of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza"-IRCCS, Foggia, Italy.
Adriano FernandesDepartment of Innovation, Santa Casa da Misericórdia da Amadora (SCMA), Amadora, Portugal.
Laura FioriniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Ana GamaDepartment of Innovation, Santa Casa da Misericórdia da Amadora (SCMA), Amadora, Portugal.
Ana Perandrés GómezFundación Ageing Lab, Mengibar, Spain.
Lucia GonzalezFundación Ageing Lab, Mengibar, Spain.
Diana GuardadoCáritas Diocesana de Coimbra (CDC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Tahira IqbalInstitute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
María Sanchez MeleroTechnical Research Centre of Furniture and Wood of the Region of Murcia, Yecla, Spain.
Francisco José Melero MuñozTechnical Research Centre of Furniture and Wood of the Region of Murcia, Yecla, Spain.
Francisco Javier Moreno MuroTelecommunication Networks Engineering Group, Technical University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Femke NijboerBiomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Sofia OrtetCáritas Diocesana de Coimbra (CDC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Erika RoviniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lara ToccafondiUmana Persone, Grosseto, Italy.
Sefora TuncBiomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Kuldar TaveterInstitute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Information and communication technology solutions have the potential to support active and healthy aging and improve monitoring and treatment outcomes. To make such solutions acceptable, all stakeholders must be involved in the requirements elicitation process. Due to the COVID-19 situation, alternative approaches to commonly used face-to-face methods must often be used. One aim of the current article is to share a unique experience from the Pharaon project where due to the COVID-19 outbreak alternative elicitation methods were used. In addition, an overview of common functional, quality, and emotional goals identified by six pilot sites is presented to complement the knowledge about the needs of older adults. Methods: Originally planned face-to-face co-creation seminars were impossible to carry out, and all pilot sites chose alternative requirements elicitation methods that were most suitable in their situation. The elicited requirements were presented in the form of goal models. In one summary goal model, we provide an overview of common functional, quality, and emotional goals. Results: Different elicitation methods were combined based on the digital literacy of the target group and their access to digital tools. Methods applied without digital technologies were phone interviews, reviews of literature and previous projects, while by means of digital technologies online interviews, online questionnaires, and (semi-)virtual co-creation seminars were conducted. The combination of the methods allowed to involve all planned stakeholders. Virtual and semi-virtual co-creation seminars created collaborative environment comparable to face-to-face situations, while online participation helped to save the time of the participants. The most prevalent functional goals elicited were "Monitor health," "Receive advice," "Receive information." "Easy to use/comfortable," "personalized/tailored," "automatic/smart" were identified as most prevalent quality goals. Most frequently occurring emotional goals were "involved," "empowered," and "informed." Conclusion: There are alternative methods to face-to-face co-creation seminars, which effectively involve older adults and other stakeholders in the requirements elicitation process. Despite the used elicitation method, the requirements can be easily transformed into goal models to present the results in a uniform way. The common requirements across different pilots provided a strong foundation for representing detailed requirements and input for further software development processes.

Indexed as

active agingecosystemelicitation methodsemotional goalsfunctional goalsPharaonquality goalsrequirements elicitation

Identifiers

PMID35295401
PMCPMC8918691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.