Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295283›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Collaborative Filtering Recommendation of Music MOOC Resources Based on Spark Architecture.

Lifu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lifu WangMusic Conservatory, Shandong University of Arts, Jinan 250000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-3461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of MOOC platforms, MOOC resources have grown substantially, causing the problem of information overload. It is difficult for users to select the courses they need from a large number of MOOC resources. It is necessary to help users select the right music courses and at the same time make the outstanding music courses stand out. Recommendation systems are considered a more efficient way to solve the information overload problem. To improve the accuracy of the recommendation results of music MOOC resources, a mixed collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on Spark architecture is proposed. First, the user data and item data are modeled and scored by the collaborative filtering algorithm, then the tree structure of the XGBoost model and the features of regular learning are combined to predict the scores, and then the two algorithms are mixed to solve the optimal objective function to obtain the set of candidate recommendation data. Then, the frog-jumping algorithm is used to train the weighting factors, and the optimal combination of weighting factors is used as the training result of the samples to realize the data analysis of the mixed collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm. The experimental results in the music MOOC resource show that the average absolute error and root mean square error of the proposed method are 0.406 and 1.117, respectively, when the sparsity is 30%, which are lower than those of other existing collaborative filtering recommendation methods, with higher accuracy and execution efficiency.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceMusicAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID35295283
PMCPMC8920684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.