ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Predicting ICU Mortality in Rheumatic Heart Disease: Comparison of XGBoost and Logistic Regression.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble learning for predicting birth trauma using high-dimensional data in the neonatal intensive care unit.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes in sepsis- induced coagulopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Application of XGBoost and logistic regression in predicting 90 days mortality for elderly severe acute renal failure patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparing manual vs. automated machine learning and deep learning models for predicting one-year mortality in elderly hip fracture patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Intensive care unit admission and mortality in rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Survival prediction modelling in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with LASSO regression and explainable machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Factors influencing HPV vaccine hesitancy among university students in China: A cross-sectional survey utilizing the 3Cs model.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing the Predictive Capabilities of Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average and Linear Regression Models for Acute Changes in Clinical and Selected Laboratory Parameters in Children After Cardiac Surgery in the ICU.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting 30-day mortality in severely injured elderly patients with trauma in Korea using machine learning algorithms: a retrospective study.Journal of trauma and injury · 2024Article
- Machine learning for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in intensive care unit.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Nomogram and Web Calculator Based on Lasso-Logistic Regression for Predicting Persistent Organ Failure in Acute Pancreatitis Patients.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Predicting colorectal cancer risk: a novel approach using anemia and blood test markers.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- A Retrospective Cohort Study: Predicting 90-Day Mortality for ICU Trauma Patients with a Machine Learning Algorithm Using XGBoost Using MIMIC-III Database.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Machine learning-based in-hospital mortality risk prediction tool for intensive care unit patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Status Forecasting Based on the Baseline Information Using Logistic Regression.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dynamic Prediction of Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcome for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Applying logistic LASSO regression for the diagnosis of atypical Crohn's disease.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) accounts for a large proportion of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) deaths. Early prediction of RHD can help with timely and appropriate treatment to improve survival outcomes, and the XGBoost machine learning technology can be used to identify predictive factors; however, its use has been limited in the past. We compared the performance of logistic regression and XGBoost in predicting hospital mortality among patients with RHD from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Methods: The patients with RHD in the MIMIC-IV database were divided into two groups retrospectively according to the availability of data and its clinical significance based on whether they survived or died. Backward stepwise regression was used to analyze the independent factors influencing patients with RHD, and to compare the differences between the two groups. The XGBoost algorithm and logistic regression were used to establish two prediction models, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and decision-curve analysis (DCA) were used to test and compare the models. Finally, DCA and the clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to validate the model. Results: Data on 1,634 patients with RHD were analyzed, comprising 207 who died during hospitalization and 1,427 survived. According to estimated results for the two models using AUCs [0.838 (95% confidence interval = 0.786-0.891) and 0.815 (95% confidence interval = 0.765-0.865)] and DCA, the logistic regression model performed better. DCA and CIC verified that the logistic regression model had convincing predictive value. Conclusions: We used logistic regression analysis to establish a more meaningful prediction model for the final outcome of patients with RHD. This model might be clinically useful for patients with RHD and help clinicians to provide detailed treatments and precise management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.