ArticleIntegrative medicine research2022
Introduction to methodology for the development of an integrative medical service model.
Article in Integrative medicine research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this article was to present a valid and reliable theoretical framework and method for the development of an integrated medical service model for the four major diseases. Methods: Methodologies for each process were presented based on three theoretical frameworks. The three theories were the double diamond process model, the Donabedian model, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health model. Based on this, in the process of problem finding, a literature review, service user questionnaire, and interview methods were applied. For problem definition and solution, expert focus group interview and expert Delphi methods were applied. The subjects of the study were mainly selected from experts for each disease and users of medical services. For literature review, systematic literature review and subject range literature review were conducted, and for analysis, a meta-analysis was carried out. In the case of focus group interview and Delphi, the validity and reliability of domain derivation and sub-items were analyzed by applying the qualitative analysis method. Results: To develop an integrative medical service model, a theoretical framework and a systematic methodology were needed, and case studies were performed to prove its validity and reliability. This showed that the development of a medical service model needs to follow a scientific procedure. Conclusions: By introducing methodological approaches and procedures for the development of an integrated medical service model for the four major diseases, the researchers provided basic information on model development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.