Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295109›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2021

Ana Carolina Cardoso Dos Santos Durão, Wesley Nogueira Brandão, Vitor Bruno, Lídia Emmanuela W Spelta, Stephanie de Oliveira Duro, Nilton Barreto Dos Santos, Beatriz Aparecida Passos Bismara Paranhos, Nágela Ghabdan Zanluqui, Maurício Yonamine, Jean Pierre Schatzmann Peron and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Maternal use of electronic cigarettes and impact on offspring: a double-hit model.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Carolina Cardoso Dos Santos DurãoDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wesley Nogueira BrandãoDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vitor BrunoDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lídia Emmanuela W SpeltaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Stephanie de Oliveira DuroDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nilton Barreto Dos SantosDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Beatriz Aparecida Passos Bismara ParanhosDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nágela Ghabdan ZanluquiDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maurício YonamineDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jean Pierre Schatzmann PeronDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carolina Demarchi MunhozDepartment of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tania MarcourakisDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The embryonic stage is the most vulnerable period for congenital abnormalities. Due to its prolonged developmental course, the central nervous system (CNS) is susceptible to numerous genetic, epigenetic, and environmental influences. During embryo implantation, the CNS is more vulnerable to external influences such as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), increasing the risk for delayed fetal growth, sudden infant death syndrome, and immune system abnormalities. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of

Indexed as

cell cultureenvironmental tobacco smokeexperimental autoimmue encephalomyelitisneuroinflammationpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35295109
PMCPMC8915864
OpenAlexW4205338030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.