Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35295016›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2021

Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.

Ekta Dhamija, Akhil Baby, Neerja Bhatla, Vishnu Prasad Pulappadi, Mukesh Kumar, Sunesh Kumar, Lalit Kumar, Dayanand Sharma

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ekta DhamijaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Akhil BabyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neerja BhatlaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vishnu Prasad PulappadiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mukesh KumarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sunesh KumarDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Lalit KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dayanand SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dr B.R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: Imaging has been added to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 staging system of cervical carcinoma. This study was performed to assess the impact of imaging in staging and to ascertain the prevalence and pattern of nodal metastasis on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in patients with cervical carcinoma who were treated based on FIGO 2009 staging system. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate all patients with biopsy-proven cervical carcinoma who underwent CECT of abdomen at a tertiary cancer centre in north India from April 2017 to April 2019 and for whom either baseline or follow up scans were available. In patients with enlarged or necrotic lymph nodes, the location, size and pattern of infiltration of adjacent organs were recorded. Results: A total of 602 patients of cervical carcinoma had undergone CT during the study period, of whom 138 (22.9%) underwent CT at baseline and 464 (77.1%) patients during follow up. The FIGO (2009) stage distribution at the time of presentation was stage IB: 109 (18.1%); stage IIA: 14 (2.3%), stage IIB: 118 (19.6%), stage IIIA: 12 (2%), stage IIIB: 277 (46%), stage IVA: 20 (3.3%) and stage IVB: 52 (8.6%). Ninety of the 138 (65.22%) patients underwent a stage shift according to the FIGO 2018 because of the presence of enlarged lymph nodes at baseline scan. Sixteen (2.7%) patients had infiltrative nodal masses most commonly involving the blood vessels (n=14) followed by ureter (n=8), bones (n=5), muscle and bowel (n=3, each). The majority (14/16) of these patients presented with vague abdominal pain, discomfort and vomiting, while two had bone pain. Interpretation & conclusions: CECT at baseline helps in accurately assessing the stage in cervical carcinoma. It helps in the identification of lymph node metastasis in cervical carcinoma, which is crucial for guiding accurate management.

Indexed as

CarcinomaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervix UteriFemaleHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesCarcinoma cervixFIGO staginginfiltrative lymph nodemetastatic lymph nodespelvic lymphadenopathy

Identifiers

PMID35295016
PMCPMC9131760
OpenAlexW4285686064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.