Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294985›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2022

Design, Usability, and Acceptability of a Needs-Based, Automated Dashboard to Provide Individualized Patient-Care Data to Pediatric Residents.

Julia K W Yarahuan, Huay-Ying Lo, Lanessa Bass, Jeff Wright, Lauren M Hess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A novel approach to patient portal activation data to power equity improvements.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia K W YarahuanDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Huay-Ying LoSection of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States.
Lanessa BassSection of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States.
Jeff WrightInformation Services, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States.
Lauren M HessSection of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPediatric residency programs are required by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to provide residents with patient-care and quality metrics to facilitate self-identification of knowledge gaps to prioritize improvement efforts. Trainees are interested in receiving this data, but this is a largely unmet need. Our objectives were to (1) design and implement an automated dashboard providing individualized data to residents, and (2) examine the usability and acceptability of the dashboard among pediatric residents.

methodsWe developed a dashboard containing individualized patient-care data for pediatric residents with emphasis on needs identified by residents and residency leadership. To build the dashboard, we created a connection from a clinical data warehouse to data visualization software. We allocated patients to residents based on note authorship and created individualized reports with masked identities that preserved anonymity. After development, we conducted usability and acceptability testing with 11 resident users utilizing a mixed-methods approach. We conducted interviews and anonymous surveys which evaluated technical features of the application, ease of use, as well as users' attitudes toward using the dashboard. Categories and subcategories from usability interviews were identified using a content analysis approach.

resultsOur dashboard provides individualized metrics including diagnosis exposure counts, procedure counts, efficiency metrics, and quality metrics. In content analysis of the usability testing interviews, the most frequently mentioned use of the dashboard was to aid a resident's self-directed learning. Residents had few concerns about the dashboard overall. Surveyed residents found the dashboard easy to use and expressed intention to use the dashboard in the future.

conclusionAutomated dashboards may be a solution to the current challenge of providing trainees with individualized patient-care data. Our usability testing revealed that residents found our dashboard to be useful and that they intended to use this tool to facilitate development of self-directed learning plans.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationHealth Services Needs and DemandInternship and ResidencyPatient CareAccreditationChildHumansLearningSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35294985
PMCPMC8926457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.