ReviewComputers in biology and medicine2022
Metaheuristics based COVID-19 detection using medical images: A review.
Review in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A two-stage preprocessing and classification approach for accurate COVID-19 detection in X-ray images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and Performance Analysis of a Semi-Supervised Gait Recognition Model for Pediatric Abnormalities Using a Hybrid Dataset.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Novel Hybrid Improved RIME Algorithm for Global Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimal Designs for Nonlinear Mixed-effects Models Using Competitive Swarm Optimizer with Mutated Agents.Research square · 2023Article
- Emerging technologies for COVID (ET-CoV) detection and diagnosis: Recent advancements, applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Review
- Design and Analysis of a Deep Learning Ensemble Framework Model for the Detection of COVID-19 and Pneumonia Using Large-Scale CT Scan and X-ray Image Datasets.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Hybrid Feature Selection Approach to Screen a Novel Set of Blood Biomarkers for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many countries in the world have been facing the rapid spread of COVID-19 since February 2020. There is a dire need for efficient and cheap automated diagnosis systems that can reduce the pressure on healthcare systems. Extensive research is being done on the use of image classification for the detection of COVID-19 through X-ray and CT-scan images of patients. Deep learning has been the most popular technique for image classification during the last decade. However, the performance of deep learning-based methods heavily depends on the architecture of the deep neural network. Over the last few years, metaheuristics have gained popularity for optimizing the architecture of deep neural networks. Metaheuristics have been widely used to solve different complex non-linear optimization problems due to their flexibility, simplicity, and problem independence. This paper aims to study the different image classification techniques for chest images, including the applications of metaheuristics for optimization and feature selection of deep learning and machine learning models. The motivation of this study is to focus on applications of different types of metaheuristics for COVID-19 detection and to shed some light on future challenges in COVID-19 detection from medical images. The aim is to inspire researchers to focus their research on overlooked aspects of COVID-19 detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.