Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294769›Full record

ReviewDrugs2022

Sulopenem: An Intravenous and Oral Penem for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.

George G Zhanel, Marianna Pozdirca, Alyssa R Golden, Courtney K Lawrence, Sheryl Zelenitsky, Liam Berry, Frank Schweizer, Denice Bay, Heather Adam, Michael A Zhanel and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of data on the resistance of uropathogens to sulopenem.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Spread of carbapenemase-producingEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  3. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

George G ZhanelClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada. ggzhanel@pcsinternet.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3238-0082
Marianna PozdircaCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Alyssa R GoldenClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Courtney K LawrenceCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Sheryl ZelenitskyCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Liam BerryDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Frank SchweizerClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Denice BayClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Heather AdamClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Michael A ZhanelClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Philippe Lagacé-WiensClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Andrew WalktyClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Neal IrfanDepartment of Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kurt NaberDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Joseph P LynchDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
James A KarlowskyClinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, MS673-820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Manitoba Health · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CATechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulopenem (formerly known as CP-70,429, and CP-65,207 when a component of a racemic mixture with its R isomer) is an intravenous and oral penem that possesses in vitro activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant, extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing, multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales. Sulopenem is being developed to treat patients with uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) as well as intra-abdominal infections. This review will focus mainly on its use in UTIs. The chemical structure of sulopenem shares properties of penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. Sulopenem is available as an oral prodrug formulation, sulopenem etzadroxil, which is hydrolyzed by intestinal esterases, resulting in active sulopenem. In early studies, the S isomer of CP-65,207, later developed as sulopenem, demonstrated greater absorption, higher drug concentrations in the urine, and increased stability against the renal enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 compared with the R isomer, which set the stage for its further development as a UTI antimicrobial. Sulopenem is active against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms. Sulopenem's β-lactam ring alkylates the serine residues of penicillin-binding protein (PBP), which inhibits peptidoglycan cross-linking. Due to its ionization and low molecular weight, sulopenem passes through outer membrane proteins to reach PBPs of Gram-negative bacteria. While sulopenem activity is unaffected by many β-lactamases, resistance arises from alterations in PBPs (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]), expression of carbapenemases (e.g., carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia), reduction in the expression of outer membrane proteins (e.g., some Klebsiella spp.), and the presence of efflux pumps (e.g., MexAB-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa), or a combination of these mechanisms. In vitro studies have reported that sulopenem demonstrates greater activity than meropenem and ertapenem against Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and Staphylococcus epidermidis, as well as similar activity to carbapenems against Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes. With some exceptions, sulopenem activity against Gram-negative aerobes was less than ertapenem and meropenem but greater than imipenem. Sulopenem activity against Escherichia coli carrying ESBL, CTX-M, or Amp-C enzymes, or demonstrating MDR phenotypes, as well as against ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, was nearly identical to ertapenem and meropenem and greater than imipenem. Sulopenem exhibited identical or slightly greater activity than imipenem against many Gram-positive and Gram-negative anaerobes, including Bacteroides fragilis. The pharmacokinetics of intravenous sulopenem appear similar to carbapenems such as imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and doripenem. In healthy subjects, reported volumes of distribution (V

Indexed as

BacteriuriaMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusProdrugsUrinary Tract InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCephalosporinsCiprofloxacinErtapenemEscherichia coliFemaleFluoroquinolonesGram-Negative BacteriaGuinea PigsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCephalosporinsCiprofloxacinErtapenemFluoroquinolonesImipenemLactamsMembrane ProteinsMeropenemProbenecidProdrugssulopenem

Identifiers

PMID35294769
OpenAlexW4220973253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.