Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294692›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2022

Opioid-Free Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Alessandro Torre, Michele Marengo, Nicola S Ledingham, Costanza Ajani, Francesco Volontè, Fabio Garofalo, Francesco Mongelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Effect of opioid-freeBJA open · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro Torre *Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, EOC, Via Tesserete, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Michele Marengo *Department of Surgery, Locarno Regional Hospital, EOC, Via Dell'Ospedale, 6600, Locarno, Switzerland.
Nicola S LedinghamDepartment of Anesthesia, Lugano Regional Hospital, EOC, Via Tesserete, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Costanza AjaniDepartment of Anesthesia, Lugano Regional Hospital, EOC, Via Tesserete, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Francesco VolontèDepartment of Surgery, Sant'Anna Clinic, Via Sant'Anna 1, 6924, Lugano, Switzerland.
Fabio GarofaloDepartment of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, EOC, Via Tesserete, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Francesco MongelliDepartment of Surgery, Bellinzona e Valli Regional Hospital, EOC, via Ospedale 12, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland. francesco.mongelli@mail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8824-651X
Ospedale regionale di Lugano · CHOspedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli · CHOspedale Regionale di Locarno · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients undergoing bariatric surgery are at particular high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Few studies have shown the superiority of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) over general anesthesia with opioids in bariatric surgery. The aim was to investigate the potential advantages of the OFA in bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective study on a prospectively collected database that included bariatric patients over a 3-year period. All patients who underwent bariatric surgery at our institution were included and divided into opioid-free or standard anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. Data was collected and analyzed using a propensity score.

resultsWe included 344 patients, of these 209 (60.8%) received opioid-free and 135 (39.2%) received a standard anesthesia. Mean age was 46.2 ± 11.2 years, 265 (77.0%) patients were female, and 238 (69.2%) had at least one associated medical problem. The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, associated medical problems, and type of operations. Postoperatively, we observed no significant difference in opioid requirement, while significantly less doses of antiemetics were administered in the OFA group at postoperative day 1 (0.4 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 1.0 doses, p = 0.006) and 2 (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 0.2 ± 0.6 doses, p = 0.022). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the OFA group (2.8 ± 0.9 vs. 3.5 ± 2.0 days, p < 0.001) both in the overall and in the propensity score-matched analyses.

conclusionOFA is effective for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Perioperative outcomes are similar, while OFA patients required less antiemetics and were discharged earlier from hospital.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsBariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative PainPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidAntiemeticsAnalgesiaAnesthesiaBariatric surgeryObesityOpioid-freePONV

Identifiers

PMID35294692
OpenAlexW4221074589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.