Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294665›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2022

The comparison of curcuminoid formulations or its combination with conventional therapies versus conventional therapies alone for knee osteoarthritis.

Yingying Wan, Wenting Sun, Jiaxi Yang, Jianxun Ren, Qiuai Kou

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06105840 (Effect of Combination of Curcuminoid Standardized Turmeric Extract With Acupressure on Inflammatory Markers, Endorphins and Quality of Life in Elderly People With Osteoarthritis Genu), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06105840 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Combination of Curcuminoid Standardized Turmeric Extract With Acupressure on Inflammatory Markers, Endorphins and Quality of Life in Elderly People With Osteoarthritis Genu

TypeinterventionalSponsorGadjah Mada UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsAcupressure and Standardized Curcuminoid from Turmeric Extract, Sham Acupressure and Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingying WanXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Playground, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-8083
Wenting SunXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Playground, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Jiaxi YangXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Playground, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China.
Jianxun RenXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Playground, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China. rjx131@sina.com.
Qiuai KouXiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1 Xiyuan Playground, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, China. kqaxuesheng@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0331-2387
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPresently, curcuminoid formulations or its combination with conventional therapies has been used for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Nevertheless, evidence is limited due to small-sized clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of curcuminoid formulations or its combination with conventional therapies for KOA.

methodsRandomized controlled trials comparing curcuminoid formulations or its combination with conventional therapies versus conventional therapies, such as non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and chondroitin sulfate/glucosamine, were searched from databases.

resultsIn total, 14 studies involving 1533 patients were included. Curcuminoid formulations were comparative to NSAIDs in reducing Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and WOMAC score for pain/stiffness/physical function. No significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of patients' satisfaction index, patients' global assessment, reduction of several inflammatory factor, rate of drug compliance, and rescue medication. Notably, curcuminoid formulations combined with NSAIDs significantly reduced VAS and WOMAC/Knee injury and OA Outcome Score (KOOS) pain score more than NSAIDs did. In addition, the curcuminoid formulations were superior to chondroitin sulfate/glucosamine in reducing VAS, total WOMAC score, and WOMAC score for stiffness/difficulty in physical function, while no significant difference was seen in reducing WOMAC pain score and Karnofsky Performance Scale score.

conclusionsCurcuminoid formulations may be considered a promising alternative for treating KOA. Key points • Curcuminoid formulations are comparative to NSAIDs for KOA. • Curcuminoid formulations are superior to chondroitin sulfate/glucosamine for KOA. • Curcuminoid formulations could provide additional benefits in alleviating pain and some adverse events caused by NSAIDs.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChondroitin SulfatesDiarylheptanoidsGlucosamineHumansPainTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalChondroitin SulfatesDiarylheptanoidsGlucosamineChondroitin sulfateConventional therapiesCurcuminoidGlucosamineKOAMeta-analysisNSAIDs

Identifiers

PMID35294665
OpenAlexW4220853445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.