Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294636›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

The Cologne-Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DMEK Donor Study (COMEDOS) - design and review of the influence of donor characteristics on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) outcome.

Silvia Schrittenlocher, Mario Matthaei, Björn Bachmann, Claus Cursiefen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Incidence and management of early postoperative complications in lamellar corneal transplantation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia SchrittenlocherFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. Silvia.Schrittenlocher@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-6777
Mario MatthaeiFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Björn BachmannFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Claus CursiefenFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR2240Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHR 1666/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior lamellar keratoplasty and especially Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are gaining interest worldwide. Little is known about the influence of donor factors on DMEK outcome. Here we provide an overview of the existing peer-reviewed literature on this topic and present the design of the upcoming cooperation study COMEDOS (Cologne-Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DMEK Donor Study).

methodsA literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted to retrieve articles published between September 2013 and May 2021. Seventeen peer-reviewed articles were selected. Design and concept of the prospective COMEDOS are outlined.

resultsMain interest parameters were the donor diabetes mellitus status, age, and lens status. There is a large heterogeneity regarding the sample size, study design, and investigated parameters. There seems to be a consensus that younger donors are associated with tighter rolls, a more difficult preparation, and unfolding setting. Diabetic donors seem to increase the risk of tissue tearing due to adherences and result more frequently in preparation failure. The COMEDOS aims not only to analyze the diabetes status of the donor, but also to correlate all donor systemic comorbidities and their ophthalmologic history to the DMEK clinical outcome. Furthermore, a correlation of Descemet membrane lamella preparation and surgery outcome is planned.

conclusionCurrently, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the effect and impact of donor tissue characteristics on DMEK outcome and complications. An in-depth investigation is planned by the upcoming COMEDOS to close this knowledge gap.

Indexed as

Descemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyDiabetes MellitusDescemet MembraneEndothelium, CornealHumansProspective StudiesTissue DonorsCorneaDMEKDonorGraft preparationLamellar keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID35294636
PMCPMC9325796
OpenAlexW4220764411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.