Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294619›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Risk of hematoma after hemithyroidectomy in an outpatient setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karin Jeppesen, Caroline Moos, Tórhild Holm, Andreas Kristian Pedersen, Helene Skjøt-Arkil

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karin JeppesenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark. karin.jeppesen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-9901
Caroline MoosDepartment of Research and Learning, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4997-4319
Tórhild HolmFaculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1366-4215
Andreas Kristian PedersenDepartment of Research and Learning, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5406-1675
Helene Skjøt-ArkilDepartment of Research and Learning, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-6375
Region of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAfter thyroid surgery, the overriding concern is the risk of post-thyroid bleeding (PTB). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety of hemithyroidectomy in an outpatient setting compared to an inpatient setting. The objectives were to (1) find the proportion of PTB in patients scheduled for outpatient hemithyroidectomy, (2) examine if outpatient hemithyroidectomy is clinically safe compared to an inpatient setting and (3) evaluate which selection criteria are most relevant for hemithyroidectomy in an outpatient setting.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid) and the Cochrane Library from inception until September 2021. We included studies reporting on PTB of patients after hemithyroidectomy in an outpatient setting. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. The results were synthesised using Bayesian meta-analysis. Certainty in evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

resultsThis review included 11 cohort studies and 9 descriptive studies reporting solely on outpatients resulting in a total of 46,866 patients. PTB was experienced by 58 of the 9025 outpatients (0.6%) and 415 of the 37,841 inpatients (1.1%). There was no difference between the PTB rate of outpatients and inpatients (RR 0.715 CrI [0.396-1.243]). The certainty of the evidence was very low due to the high risk of bias.

conclusionThe risk of PTB in an outpatient setting is very low, and outpatient hemithyroidectomy should be considered clinically safe. The most relevant selection criteria to consider in outpatient hemithyroidectomy are (1) relevant comorbidities and (2) psycho/-social factors.

Indexed as

OutpatientsThyroidectomyBayes TheoremHematomaHumansInpatientsBayesian meta-analysisHematomaHemithyroidectomyOutpatientSystematic reviewThyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID35294619
PMCPMC9249722
OpenAlexW4221111553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.