Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294581›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2022

Diagnostics and prognostic evaluation in renal cell tumors: the German S3 guidelines recommendations.

Kerstin Junker, Peter Hallscheidt, Heiko Wunderlich, Arndt Hartmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kerstin JunkerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland Medical Center, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg, Germany. Kerstin.junker@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-8128
Peter HallscheidtGemeinschaftspraxis für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Worms, Germany.
Heiko WunderlichDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Georg-Klinikum, Eisenach, Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEIhre-Radiologen · DEKlinikum St. Georg · DESaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German guidelines on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been developed at highest level of evidence based on systematic literature review. In this paper, we are presenting the current recommendations on diagnostics including preoperative imaging and imaging for stage evaluation as well as histopathological classification. The role of tumor biopsy is further discussed. In addition, different prognostic scores and the status of biomarkers in RCC are critically evaluated.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansKidneyPrognosisImagingPrognosisRenal cell carcinomaS3 guidelineTumor biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35294581
PMCPMC9512865
OpenAlexW4220939479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.