ArticleDer Nervenarzt2022
[Inpatient equivalent home-treatment: an overview].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A comparison of direct admissions to inpatient-equivalent home treatment with transfers from psychiatric wards].Psychiatrische Praxis · 2025Article
- Premature termination, satisfaction with care, and shared decision-making during home treatment compared to inpatient treatment: A quasi-experimental trial.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023Article
- Equal access to outreach mental health care? Exploring how the place of residence influences the use of intensive home treatment in a rural catchment area in Germany.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inpatient equivalent home-treatment (IEHT) was implemented in Germany in 2018. Persons with a mental disorder can be admitted to acute multiprofessional IEHT to avoid or shorten inpatient hospital treatment. Exclusion criteria are amongst others lack of consent of cohabitants or endangerment of self and others. Advantages of IEHT include normalization and reduction of stigma. Nevertheless, administrative requirements are high. While there is international evidence for home treatment and crisis resolution teams, there is still a lack of evidence for the concept of IEHT, although specific studies are currently being carried out (e.g. AktiV study financed by the Innovation Fund). Overall, IEHT is important for mental health services and should be further developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35294580What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.