ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[The 41,000 long-term survivor cohort of the German Childhood Cancer Registry].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Feasibility of Integrating a Standardized Psychosocial Follow-Up After Childhood Cancer-An Interim Analysis of the LE-Na Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in long-term cancer survivors treated with craniospinal irradiation.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- High Parathyroid Hormone Rather than Low Vitamin D Is Associated with Reduced Event-Free Survival in Childhood Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Proposal of a diagnostic algorithm for radiation-induced dropped head syndrome in long-term childhood cancer survivors based on a prospective study in a specialized clinical setting and a review of the literature.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Implementation of a clinical long-term follow-up database for adult childhood cancer survivors in Germany: a feasibility study at two specialised late effects clinics.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Childhood and adolescent cancer in Germany - an overview.Journal of health monitoring · 2023Article
- Patient-reported long-term outcome following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOne-third of childhood cancer long-term survivors suffer from severe late effects (e.g., secondary cancer and cardiovascular diseases). The German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) holds approximately 70,000 registered cancer cases, of which more than 41,000 are long-term survivors, with recent follow-up and contact information that can be used for scientific studies on late effects. The characteristics of this cohort are presented, previous late effects studies with the support of the GCCR are described, and the respective participation rates are reported.
methodsFor all patients who developed cancer between 1980 and 2019 and were in long-term observation at the GCCR, the distribution of diagnoses, current age, observation time, and number of secondary cancers as of 16 July 2021 was determined. The rates of patients who responded to history queries were computed. The influence of determinants on the participation rate were calculated using generalized estimating equations.
resultsThe cohort comprises 41,466 long-term survivors. Of these, 10% are older than 40 years and 40% had their cancer diagnosis more than 20 years ago. The participation rates range between 30 and 60% and depend on age at diagnosis, the complexity of the study, and the number of previously conducted surveys. A time interval of at least four years between two consecutive contacts seems optimal.
conclusionsOur unique cohort enables population-based research on late effects after childhood cancer. To define a sensible time interval for contacting survivors is essential. In order to ensure that survivors are not contacted too frequently, the number of survivors included in research projects should be as small as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.