Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Assessment and counseling to get the best efficiency and effectiveness of the assistive technology (MATCH): Study protocol.

Thais Pousada García, Betania Groba Gonzalez, Laura Nieto-Riveiro, Nereida Canosa Domínguez, Saturnino Maldonado-Bascón, Roberto J López-Sastre, Soraya Pacheco DaCosta, Isabel González-Gómez, Alberto J Molina-Cantero, Javier Pereira Loureiro

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04723784 (Http), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04723784 naterminatednot on this map

Http://Talionis.Citic.Udc.es

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade da CoruñaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsDisability Physical, Disability, Learning, Disabling DiseaseArmsInitial Assessment, Implementation of assistive technology in the daily life of participants, Application of outcome measures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thais Pousada GarcíaCITIC (Centre for Information and Communications Technology Research), TALIONIS Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-0429
Betania Groba GonzalezCITIC (Centre for Information and Communications Technology Research), TALIONIS Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Laura Nieto-RiveiroCITIC (Centre for Information and Communications Technology Research), TALIONIS Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Nereida Canosa DomínguezCITIC (Centre for Information and Communications Technology Research), TALIONIS Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Saturnino Maldonado-BascónGRAM, Department of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto J López-SastreGRAM, Department of Signal Theory and Communications, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Soraya Pacheco DaCostaFINEMEV, Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-3560
Isabel González-GómezDepartment of Electronic technology, E.T.S.I. Informatics. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-1480
Alberto J Molina-CanteroDepartment of Electronic technology, E.T.S.I. Informatics. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Javier Pereira LoureiroCITIC (Centre for Information and Communications Technology Research), TALIONIS Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-0723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine the psychosocial impact of assistive technology(AT) based on robotics and artificial intelligence in the life of people with disabilities.

backgroundThe best match between any person with disabilities and its AT only can be gotten through a complete assessment and monitoring of his/her needs, abilities, priorities, difficulties and limitations. Without this analysis, it's possible that the device won't meet the individual's expectations. Therefore, it is important that any project focused on the development of innovating AT for people with disabilities includes the perspective of outcome measures as an important phase of the research. In this sense, the integration of the assessment, implementation process and outcome measures is crucial to guarantee the transferability for the project findings and to get the perspective from the final user.

methodsPilot study, with prospective, longitudinal and analytical cohort. The study lasts from July 2020 until April 2023. The sample is formed by people with disabilities, ages from 2-21, that will participate from the first stage of the process (initial assessment of their abilities and needs) to the final application of outcome measures instruments (with a complete implication during the test of technology). DISCUSSION: Only with the active participation of the person is possible to carry out a user-centered approach. This fact will allow us to define and generate technological solutions that really adjust to the expectations, needs and priorities of the people with disabilities, avoiding the AT from being abandoned, with the consequent health and social spending.

trial registrationClinical Trials ID: NCT04723784; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSelf-Help DevicesCounselingFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35294488
PMCPMC8926266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.