Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294435›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

RosettaSurf-A surface-centric computational design approach.

Andreas Scheck, Stéphane Rosset, Michaël Defferrard, Andreas Loukas, Jaume Bonet, Pierre Vandergheynst, Bruno E Correia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas ScheckInstitute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2123-6499
Stéphane RossetInstitute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-6017
Michaël DefferrardSignal Processing Laboratory (LTS2), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6028-9024
Andreas LoukasSignal Processing Laboratory (LTS2), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4866-1599
Jaume BonetInstitute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5210-4387
Pierre VandergheynstSignal Processing Laboratory (LTS2), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9070-900X
Bruno E CorreiaInstitute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-8636
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are typically represented by discrete atomic coordinates providing an accessible framework to describe different conformations. However, in some fields proteins are more accurately represented as near-continuous surfaces, as these are imprinted with geometric (shape) and chemical (electrostatics) features of the underlying protein structure. Protein surfaces are dependent on their chemical composition and, ultimately determine protein function, acting as the interface that engages in interactions with other molecules. In the past, such representations were utilized to compare protein structures on global and local scales and have shed light on functional properties of proteins. Here we describe RosettaSurf, a surface-centric computational design protocol, that focuses on the molecular surface shape and electrostatic properties as means for protein engineering, offering a unique approach for the design of proteins and their functions. The RosettaSurf protocol combines the explicit optimization of molecular surface features with a global scoring function during the sequence design process, diverging from the typical design approaches that rely solely on an energy scoring function. With this computational approach, we attempt to address a fundamental problem in protein design related to the design of functional sites in proteins, even when structurally similar templates are absent in the characterized structural repertoire. Surface-centric design exploits the premise that molecular surfaces are, to a certain extent, independent of the underlying sequence and backbone configuration, meaning that different sequences in different proteins may present similar surfaces. We benchmarked RosettaSurf on various sequence recovery datasets and showcased its design capabilities by generating epitope mimics that were biochemically validated. Overall, our results indicate that the explicit optimization of surface features may lead to new routes for the design of functional proteins.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringProteinsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyProtein ConformationStatic ElectricityProteins

Identifiers

PMID35294435
PMCPMC9015148
OpenAlexW4220851837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.