Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294391›Full record

ArticleGlobal health, science and practice2022

Lessons Learned From the Use of the Most Significant Change Technique for Adaptive Management of Complex Health Interventions.

Saori Ohkubo, Lisa Mwaikambo, Ruwaida M Salem, Lekan Ajijola, Paul Nyachae, Mukesh Kumar Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health, science and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Qualitative Evaluation ofGlobal qualitative nursing research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saori OhkuboThe Challenge Initiative, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA. saori.ohkubo@jhu.edu.
Lisa MwaikamboThe Challenge Initiative, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ruwaida M SalemThe Challenge Initiative, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lekan AjijolaThe Challenge Initiative, Nigeria Hub, Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, Abuja, Nigeria.
Paul NyachaeThe Challenge Initiative, East Africa Hub, Jhpiego, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mukesh Kumar SharmaThe Challenge Initiative for Healthy Cities, India Hub, Population Services International, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Most Significant Change (MSC) technique is a complex-aware monitoring and evaluation tool, widely recognized for various adaptive management purposes. The documentation of practical examples using the MSC technique for an ongoing monitoring purpose is limited. We aim to fill the current gap by documenting and sharing the experience and lessons learned of The Challenge Initiative (TCI), which is scaling up evidence-based family planning (FP) and adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health (AYSRH) interventions in 11 countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

methodsThe qualitative assessment took place in early 2021 to document TCI's use and adaptation of MSC and determine its added value in adaptive management, routine monitoring, and cross-learning efforts. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted virtually with staff members involved in collecting and selecting MSC stories.

resultsTCI has had a positive experience with using MSC to facilitate adaptive management in multiple countries. The use of MSC has created learning opportunities that have helped diffuse evidence-based FP and AYSRH interventions both within and across countries. The responsive feedback step in the MSC process was viewed as indispensable to learning and collaboration. There are several necessary inputs to successful use of the method, including buy-in about the benefits, training on good interviewing techniques and qualitative research, and dedicated staff to manage the process.

conclusionOur assessment results suggest that the MSC technique is an effective qualitative data collection tool to strengthen routine monitoring and adaptive management efforts that allows for flexibility in how project stakeholders implement the process. The MSC technique could be an important tool for global health practitioners, policy makers, and researchers working on complex interventions because they continually need to understand stakeholders' needs and priorities, learn from lessons and evidence-based practices, and be agile about addressing potential challenges.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesSexual HealthAdministrative PersonnelAdolescentGlobal HealthHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID35294391
PMCPMC8885358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.