Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294270›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Diverse modes of binocular interactions in the mouse superior colliculus.

Ashley L Russell, Karen G Dixon, Jason W Triplett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Connectivity, Computation, and Plasticity of the Early Visual System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Mapping the Retina onto the Brain.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley L RussellCenter for Neuroscience Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia.
Karen G DixonCenter for Neuroscience Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0278-3929
Jason W TriplettCenter for Neuroscience Research, Children's National Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8064-3617
Children's National · US

Funding

Neurobehavioral Evaluation CoreP50HD105328 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WILLIAM Davis GAILLARD · 2021 to 2026
$9.3M
Mechanisms of Synaptic Specificity in Visual CircuitsR01EY025627 · NEI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TRIPLETT, JASON · 2015 to 2025
$4.5M
Role of Hhip signaling in parallel circuit formationR21EY029874 · NEI · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TRIPLETT, JASON · 2019 to 2020
$484k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025627NEI NIH HHS R21 EY029874NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The superior colliculus (SC) integrates visual and other sensory information to regulate critical reflexive and innate behaviors, such as prey capture. In the mouse, the vast majority of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) innervate the SC, including inputs from both the contralateral (contra-RGCs) and ipsilateral (ipsi-RGCs) eye. Despite this, previous studies revealed minimal neuronal responses to ipsilateral stimulation and few binocular interactions in the mouse SC. More recent work suggests that ipsi-RGC function and innervation of the SC are critical for efficient prey capture, raising the possibility that binocular interactions in the mouse SC may be more prevalent than previously thought. To explore this possibility, we investigated eye-specific and binocular influences on visual responses and tuning of SC neurons, focusing on the anteromedial region. Although the majority of SC neurons were primarily driven by contralateral eye stimulation, we observed that a substantial proportion of units were influenced or driven by ipsilateral stimulation. Clustering based on differential responses to eye-specific stimulus presentation revealed five distinct putative subpopulations and multiple modes of binocular interaction, including facilitation, summation, and suppression. Each of the putative subpopulations exhibited selectivity for orientation, and differences in spatial frequency tuning and spatial summation properties were observed between subpopulations. Further analysis of orientation tuning under different ocular conditions supported differential modes of binocular interaction between putative subtypes. Taken together, these data suggest that binocular interactions in the mouse SC may be more prevalent and diverse than previously understood.

Indexed as

Superior ColliculiVisual PathwaysAnimalsMicePhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual Perceptioneye-specificreceptive fieldvisual

Identifiers

PMID35294270
PMCPMC9076413
OpenAlexW4221090795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.