ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022
Diverse modes of binocular interactions in the mouse superior colliculus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Connectivity, Computation, and Plasticity of the Early Visual System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Evidence for a push-pull interaction between superior colliculi in monocular dynamic vision mode.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Genetically defined neuron types underlying visuomotor transformation in the superior colliculus.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Retinal origin of orientation but not direction selective maps in the superior colliculus.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Mapping the Retina onto the Brain.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Neural circuits for binocular vision: Ocular dominance, interocular matching, and disparity selectivity.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The superior colliculus (SC) integrates visual and other sensory information to regulate critical reflexive and innate behaviors, such as prey capture. In the mouse, the vast majority of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) innervate the SC, including inputs from both the contralateral (contra-RGCs) and ipsilateral (ipsi-RGCs) eye. Despite this, previous studies revealed minimal neuronal responses to ipsilateral stimulation and few binocular interactions in the mouse SC. More recent work suggests that ipsi-RGC function and innervation of the SC are critical for efficient prey capture, raising the possibility that binocular interactions in the mouse SC may be more prevalent than previously thought. To explore this possibility, we investigated eye-specific and binocular influences on visual responses and tuning of SC neurons, focusing on the anteromedial region. Although the majority of SC neurons were primarily driven by contralateral eye stimulation, we observed that a substantial proportion of units were influenced or driven by ipsilateral stimulation. Clustering based on differential responses to eye-specific stimulus presentation revealed five distinct putative subpopulations and multiple modes of binocular interaction, including facilitation, summation, and suppression. Each of the putative subpopulations exhibited selectivity for orientation, and differences in spatial frequency tuning and spatial summation properties were observed between subpopulations. Further analysis of orientation tuning under different ocular conditions supported differential modes of binocular interaction between putative subtypes. Taken together, these data suggest that binocular interactions in the mouse SC may be more prevalent and diverse than previously understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.