Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294255›Full record

ReviewCBE life sciences education2022

Reframing Educational Outcomes: Moving beyond Achievement Gaps.

Sarita Y Shukla, Elli J Theobald, Joel K Abraham, Rebecca M Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CBE life sciences education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Community college biology students' understanding ofJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exam reform: an opportunity for the redistribution of academic power.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarita Y ShuklaSchool of Educational Studies, University of Washington, Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011-8246.
Elli J TheobaldDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, WA 98195.
Joel K AbrahamDepartment of Biological Science, California State University-Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92831.
Rebecca M PriceSchool of Interdisciplinary Arts & Sciences, University of Washington, Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011-8246.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "achievement gap" has a negative and racialized history, and using the term reinforces a deficit mindset that is ingrained in U.S. educational systems. In this essay, we review the literature that demonstrates why "achievement gap" reflects deficit thinking. We explain why biology education researchers should avoid using the phrase and also caution that changing vocabulary alone will not suffice. Instead, we suggest that researchers explicitly apply frameworks that are supportive, name racially systemic inequities and embrace student identity. We review four such frameworks-opportunity gaps, educational debt, community cultural wealth, and ethics of care-and reinterpret salient examples from biology education research as an example of each framework. Although not exhaustive, these descriptions form a starting place for biology education researchers to explicitly name systems-level and asset-based frameworks as they work to end educational inequities.

Indexed as

AchievementStudentsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35294255
PMCPMC9508913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.