Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35294046›Full record

ArticleHeadache2022

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with migraine: Results of the MiCOAS qualitative study.

Dawn C Buse, Maya T Gerstein, Carrie R Houts, James S McGinley, Alyssa A Uzumcu, Kelly P McCarrier, Alexis Cooke, Nancy M Touba, Tracy K Nishida, R J Wirth and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Migraine self-management at work: a qualitative study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn C BuseVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Maya T GersteinPatient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Carrie R HoutsVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
James S McGinleyVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Alyssa A UzumcuPatient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kelly P McCarrierPatient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Alexis CookePatient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nancy M ToubaPatient Centered Outcomes, Open Health Group, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tracy K NishidaVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
R J WirthVector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Richard B LiptonNeurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Vector (United States) · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System (MiCOAS)UH3FD006795 · FDA · VECTOR PSYCHOMETRIC GROUP LLC · PI LIPTON, RICHARD B., WIRTH, ROBERT JOHN · 2021 to 2022
$3.1M
FDA HHS UH3 FD006795U.S. Food and Drug Administration UH3FD006795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an ongoing global health crisis that has had a range of impacts on people living with migraine.

methodsQualitative interviews performed as part of the Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System project, a multi-stage Food and Drug Administration-grant funded program to develop a patient-centered core set of outcome measures for use in migraine clinical trials, offered an opportunity to explore the experience of living with migraine during the pandemic as well as to examine whether migraine treatment priorities, symptoms, and associated disability changed due to the pandemic. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in the United States between the summer and fall of 2020 with 40 individuals with self-reported, medically diagnosed migraine who self-reported that they had not tested positive for or been diagnosed with COVID-19.

resultsSeventy percent (n = 28) of the sample reported ≥1 pandemic-related impact on their life with migraine. Fourteen participants reported both positive and negative impacts, twelve reported negative impacts only, and two reported positive impacts only. Among those reporting ≥1 pandemic-related impact, nine participants (32%) reported more frequent and five (17%) reported less frequent migraine attacks. Other negative impacts included interrupted medical care (n = 9; 32%), and greater stress (n = 13; 46%). The most frequent positive impact reported was greater access to health care (n = 8; 29%). Ictal and interictal symptoms were not noted to change due to the pandemic, but some respondents reported less disability due to increased flexibility of schedules and reduced expectations. Treatment priorities did not change due to the pandemic.

conclusionThe global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in both negative and positive impacts for people living with migraine. Lessons to be considered when moving into a post-pandemic world include benefits of and satisfaction with telehealth and the benefits and importance of healthy lifestyle habits and flexibility such as improved sleep, reduced stress, and fewer social expectations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Migraine DisordersHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeUnited Statescoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Food and Drug Administrationimpactmigrainepandemicqualitative

Identifiers

PMID35294046
PMCPMC9111729
OpenAlexW3174567636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.