ArticleJAMA dermatology2022
Estimating Overdiagnosis of Melanoma Using Trends Among Black and White Patients in the US.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sunscreen Use Barriers in White U.S. Adults: Gender, Generation, and Skin Phototype Differences.AJPM focus · 2026Article
- Photothermal-Chemotherapeutic Microneedle Patch Coloaded with HMnOACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Article
- Perspectives of United States dermatologists on melanoma screening and overdiagnosis: a qualitative study.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Overdiagnosis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- An extension of the validation cohort of the Dutch Early-Stage Melanoma (D-ESMEL) study for stage-specific analyses.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Social Media Posts About Medical Tests With Potential for Overdiagnosis.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Global epidemiological trends in the incidence and mortality for melanoma.Skin health and disease · 2025Article
- Incidence of melanoma in situ among racial and ethnic minorities in the United States.JAAD international · 2025Article
- Article
- Incidence and mortality trends of primary cutaneous melanoma: A 50-year Rochester Epidemiologic Project study.JAAD international · 2024Article
- Deceptive Measures of "Success" in Early Cancer Detection.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Evidence-Based Communication to Increase Melanoma Knowledge and Skin Checks.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024Article
- The benefit of early-stage diagnosis: A registry-based survey evaluating the quality of life in patients with melanoma.Skin health and disease · 2023Article
- An artificial intelligence based app for skin cancer detection evaluated in a population based setting.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- A Physician's Guide to the Use of Gene Expression Profile Ancillary Diagnostic Testing for Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2023Review
- Screening and Surveillance Bias in Cancer.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of clinical interruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis of melanoma: A 30-month retrospective review.JAAD international · 2023Article
- Diagnostic error, uncertainty, and overdiagnosis in melanoma.Pathology · 2023Review
- Advances in melanoma: epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The incidence of cutaneous melanoma has been rising rapidly among White patients in the US; however, a commensurate increase in mortality due to melanoma has not been observed. These trends suggest overdiagnosis is occurring. Objective: To quantify melanoma overdiagnosis among White patients compared with Black patients in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used joinpoint regression of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1975 to 2014 to determine melanoma incidence and mortality trends among Black and White patients in the US. Using trends in mortality due to melanoma in Black patients as a marker for improvements in medical care, the expected mortality trends in White patients if medical care had not improved were estimated. This served as a marker for the change in true cancer occurrence. Overdiagnosis was calculated as the difference between observed incidence and estimated true cancer occurrence. Analyses were stratified by sex. Data were analyzed from September to December 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of melanoma cases overdiagnosed among White patients in 2014. Results: From 1975 to 2014, melanoma incidence increased approximately 4-fold in White women (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 4.01 [95% CI, 3.65-4.41]) and 6-fold in White men (IRR, 5.97 [95% CI, 5.47-6.52]), whereas it increased less than 25% in Black women (IRR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.97-1.49]) and men (IRR, 1.17; [95% CI, 0.77-1.78]). Mortality due to melanoma decreased approximately 25% in Black women (morality rate ratio [MRR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63-0.90]) and men (MRR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.84]), was stable in White women (MRR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.96-1.09]), and increased almost 50% in White men (MRR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.25-1.77]). Had medical care not improved, estimated mortality would have increased 60% in White women and more than doubled in White men. Based on these trends, an estimated 59% (95% CI, 45%-70%) of White women and 60% (95% CI, 32%-75%) of White men with melanoma were overdiagnosed in 2014. Conclusions and Relevance: The discrepancies in incidence and mortality trends found in this cohort study suggest considerable overdiagnosis of melanoma occurring among White patients in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.