Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293872›Full record

ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2022

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Outcome of Urinary Calculi Treatment Using Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Model Development and Validation Study.

Reihaneh Moghisi, Christo El Morr, Kenneth T Pace, Mohammad Hajiha, Jimmy Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reihaneh Moghisi *School of Information Technology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2485-6025
Christo El Morr *School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6287-3438
Kenneth T PaceDivision of Urology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2778-6675
Mohammad HajihaDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9991-7166
Jimmy HuangSchool of Information Technology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock wave lithotripsy (SWL), ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are established treatments for renal stones. Historically, SWL has been a predominant and commonly used procedure for treating upper tract renal stones smaller than 20 mm in diameter due to its noninvasive nature. However, the reported failure rate of SWL after one treatment session ranges from 30% to 89%. The failure rate can be reduced by identifying candidates likely to benefit from SWL and manage patients who are likely to fail SWL with other treatment modalities. This would enhance and optimize treatment results for SWL candidates.

objectiveWe proposed to develop a machine learning model that can predict SWL outcomes to assist practitioners in the decision-making process when considering patients for stone treatment.

methodsA data set including 58,349 SWL procedures performed during 31,569 patient visits for SWL to a single hospital between 1990 and 2016 was used to construct and validate the predictive model. The AdaBoost algorithm was applied to a data set with 17 predictive attributes related to patient demographics and stone characteristics, with success or failure as an outcome. The AdaBoost algorithm was also applied to a training data set. The generated model's performance was compared to that of 5 other machine learning algorithms, namely C4.5 decision tree, naïve Bayes, Bayesian network, K-nearest neighbors, and multilayer perceptron.

resultsThe developed model was validated with a testing data set and performed significantly better than the models generated by the other 5 predictive algorithms. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 0.875 and 0.653, respectively, while its positive predictive value was 0.7159 and negative predictive value was 0.839. The C-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was 0.843, which reflects an excellent test.

conclusionsWe have developed a rigorous machine learning model to assist physicians and decision-makers to choose patients with renal stones who are most likely to have successful SWL treatment based on their demographics and stone characteristics. The proposed machine learning model can assist physicians and decision-makers in planning for SWL treatment and allow for more effective use of limited health care resources and improve patient prognoses.

Indexed as

AdaBoostensemble learningkidney diseaselithotripsymachine learningrenal stonestreatment outcomeurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID35293872
PMCPMC8968550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.