Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293702›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Campylobacter positivity and public health risks in live bird markets in Busia, Kenya: A value chain analysis.

Josephat Mbai, Samuel Njoroge, Mark Obonyo, Christina Otieno, Maurice Owiny, Eric M Fèvre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Seasonal Prevalence and Molecular Identification of ThermophilicInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Josephat MbaiKenya Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Kenyatta Hospital Grounds, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7386-9191
Samuel NjorogeInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mark ObonyoKenya Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Kenyatta Hospital Grounds, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christina OtienoSchool of Public Health, Moi University, Kesses, Kenya.
Maurice OwinyKenya Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program, Kenyatta Hospital Grounds, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eric M FèvreInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-4986

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live bird markets (LBMs) provide integral hubs for 95% of poultry produced for food. Surveillance systems in LBMs serving smallholder farmers in sub-saharan Africa are often non-functional, and data about public health risks and emerging pathogens are lacking. Studies in Kenya have reported 29-44% Campylobacter prevalence in poultry. We analysed such LBMs in Kenya for likely transmission of Campylobacter from poultry to humans. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 186 live poultry traders (LPTs) in 14 LBMs in a region with widespread backyard poultry systems. A pretested structured questionnaire was administered to all LPTs having regular contacts with poultry to gather market data and risk information on campylobacteriosis. Campylobacter was detected in individual cloacal cultures and identified through PCR. The median score obtained from the outcome of risk assessment dichotomized respondents into high and low risk categories. We performed logistic regression at 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare market characteristics and Campylobacter positivity to risk categories to identify LBM-associated public health risks. Markets had a median of 13 traders, and mean age of 46.3 ± 13.7 years. Majority 162/186 (87.1%) were males. Market behavioural processes by LPTs varied: Only 58.6% LPTs held bird species separate; onsite slaughter (38.7%); encountered sick-bird (93%) and dead-bird (83%) amidst limited health inspection (31.2%). Campylobacter positivity in live birds was 43/112 (38.4%, 95% CI: 29.4-48.1). Risk information on campylobacteriosis was low 41/114 (36%, 95% CI: 27.2-45.5). Sanitary risks were related to accumulation of litter (adjusted prevalence odds ratio [aPOR]: 19.67, 95% CI: 3.01-128.52). Accessing hand-wash facilities (aPOR: .32, 95% CI: .13-.78) and access to information (aPOR: .24, 95% CI: .09-.61) were protective. Sanitary risks were related to poor hygiene. LBMs could be central surveillance sites for Campylobacter. Public health authorities/actors should consider appropriate targeting to improve sanitary measures and Campylobacter control strategies.

Indexed as

CampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsInfluenza in BirdsAnimalsCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMalePoultryPublic HealthCampylobacterKenyalive bird marketpoultrypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35293702
PMCPMC9790384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.