Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293692›Full record

SynthesisDiagnostic cytopathology2022

Program death ligand-1 immunocytochemistry in lung cancer cytological samples: A systematic review.

Swati Satturwar, Ilaria Girolami, Enrico Munari, Francesco Ciompi, Albino Eccher, Liron Pantanowitz

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diagnostic cytopathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Swati SatturwarDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1960-9847
Ilaria GirolamiDivision of Pathology, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3537-4929
Enrico MunariPathology Unit, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Francesco CiompiComputational Pathology Group, Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Albino EccherDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9992-5550
Liron PantanowitzDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8182-5503
Ospedale di Bolzano · ITRadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this era of personalized medicine, targeted immunotherapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) blocking the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/program death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis have become an integral part of treating advanced stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and many other cancer types. Multiple monoclonal antibodies are available commercially to detect PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As most clinical trials initially required tumor biopsy for PD-L1 detection by IHC, many of the currently available PD-1/PD-L1 assays have been developed and validated on formalin fixed tissue specimens. The majority (>50%) of lung cancer cases do not have a surgical biopsy or resection specimen available for ancillary testing and instead must rely primarily on fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens for diagnosis, staging and ancillary tests. Review of the literature shows multiple studies exploring the feasibility of PD-L1 IHC on cytological samples. In addition, there are studies addressing various aspects of IHC validation on cytology preparations including pre-analytical (e.g., different fixatives), analytical (e.g., antibody clone, staining platforms, inter and intra-observer agreement, cytology-histology concordance) and post-analytical (e.g., clinical outcome) issues. Although promising results in this field have emerged utilizing cytology samples, many important questions still need to be addressed. This review summarizes the literature of PD-L1 IHC in lung cytology specimens and provides practical tips for optimizing analysis.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansImmunohistochemistryProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorcancerconcordancecytologyFNAimmunohistochemistrylungPD1/PDL1

Identifiers

PMID35293692
PMCPMC9310737
OpenAlexW4221116017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.