SynthesisThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2022
Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician-gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review.
Synthesis in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Obstetric violence in the United States and other high-income countries: an integrative review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023Pooled it
- Reproductive endocrinology and infertility exposure and medical student interest in obstetrics and gynecology specialty: a narrative review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Female career advancement in obstetrics/gynecology, and urology: a spatio-temporal comparative study over the last 2 decades in Germany.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Influencing surgical career choice among final-year medical students: a multi-center cross-sectional study in Türkiye.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Seeing Is Believing? Exploring Gender Bias in Artificial Intelligence Imagery of Specialty Doctors.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Identifying Gaps in Obstetrics and Gynecology Education: Insights From Clinical Vignettes.Cureus · 2025Article
- Patient complaints differ for male and female obstetrician-gynecologists: an exploration of 20 years of complaints data in Alberta, Canada.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025Article
- Is There a Relationship Between Medical Student Mistreatment and Specialty Choice and Career Intentions? A Systematic Review.Medical science educator · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating Unstructured Clinical Teaching During Rotations: How Medical Students' Experiences in Paediatrics and Gynaecology Influence Perceived Learning Outcomes.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Understanding the Values, Qualities, and Preferences of Patients in Their Relationships With Obstetrics and Gynecology Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey With a Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of participatory medicine · 2024Article
- The impact of gender on the self-confidence of practical and surgical skills among OBGYN residents: a trinational survey.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Evaluating an obstetrics and gynecology teaching program for medical students incorporating simulation-based education underpinned by cognitive load theory.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Gender bias or patient preference for female practitioners in Obs/Gyn care.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of men entering obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) residencies and general Ob/Gyn practice is decreasing. Gender biases against their participation may affect career decisions.
objectiveThis systematic review examines: (i) female patients' gender preferences and perceptions of men as Ob/Gyns and/or medical students; and (ii) the influence of gender on students' education and career decisions. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified relevant research via PubMed using variations of three concepts in combination: Ob/Gyn care, gender bias/preference, and medical education or career. We conducted the initial review in 2018 and repeated the search in March 2021, adding additional references via citation review of included research. SELECTION CRITERIA: We restricted the review to original research from the United States between 2000-2021. DATA COLLECTION: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, categorised into three groups: (i) patient's gender preference for Ob/Gyns; (ii) patient's gender preference for medical students during the Ob/Gyn clerkship; and (iii) influence of gender bias on Ob/Gyn career decisions. MAIN
resultsPatients prioritised their physician's care attributes (eg technical skill, compassion, experience) over gender when choosing Ob/Gyns; however, provider gender was prioritised for medical students. Male medical students more commonly reported exclusion from clinical opportunities, although objective clinical exposure was like that of female counterparts. Despite perceived gender bias, male medical students reported increased Ob/Gyn interest post-clerkship; interest did not translate into residency applications. These findings are limited by study quality and heterogeneity.
conclusionsReal and perceived gender bias among female patients and male medical students in Ob/Gyn may underlie declining numbers of men entering the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.