Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293552›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2022

Predictive value of DNA repair gene expression for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

M C Kneubil, K O B Goulart, J Brollo, G P Coelho, J Mandelli, B C Orlandin, L L Corso, M Roesch-Ely, J A P Henriques

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M C KneubilInstituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-5503
K O B GoulartInstituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-2813
J BrolloHospital Geral, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-6003
G P CoelhoLaboratório de Patologia Anatômica e Biologia Molecular, Grupo Diagnose, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3391-0022
J MandelliLaboratório de Patologia Anatômica e Biologia Molecular, Grupo Diagnose, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2087-2215
B C OrlandinÁrea do Conhecimento de Ciências Exatas e Engenharias, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-6596
L L CorsoÁrea do Conhecimento de Ciências Exatas e Engenharias, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-9578
M Roesch-ElyInstituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-1901
J A P HenriquesInstituto de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-932X
Universidade de Caxias do Sul · BRFleury S.A. (Brazil) · BRUnivates · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide analysis using microarrays has revolutionized breast cancer (BC) research. A substantial body of evidence supports the clinical utility of the 21-gene assay (Oncotype DX) and 70-gene assay (MammaPrint) to predict BC recurrence and the magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy. However, there is currently no genetic tool able to predict chemosensitivity and chemoresistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) during BC treatment. In this study, we explored the predictive value of DNA repair gene expression in the neoadjuvant setting. We selected 98 patients with BC treated with NACT. We assessed DNA repair expression in 98 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded core biopsy fragments used at diagnosis and in 32 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded post-NACT residual tumors using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The following genes were selected: BRCA1, PALB2, RAD51C, BRCA2, ATM, FANCA, MSH2, XPA, ERCC1, PARP1, and SNM1. Of 98 patients, 33 (33.7%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). The DNA expression of 2 genes assessed in pre-NACT biopsies (PALB2 and ERCC1) was lower in pCR than in non-pCR patients (P=0.005 and P=0.009, respectively). There was no correlation between molecular subtype and expression of DNA repair genes. The genes BRCA2 (P=0.009), ATM (P=0.004), FANCA (P=0.001), and PARP1 (P=0.011) showed a lower expression in post-NACT residual tumor samples (n=32) than in pre-NACT biopsy samples (n=98). The expression of 2 genes (PALB2 and ERCC1) was lower in pCR patients. These alterations in DNA repair could be considered suitable targets for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyDNA RepairFemaleGene ExpressionHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID35293552
PMCPMC8922549
OpenAlexW4221034786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.