Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293269›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Progress and challenges for the machine learning-based design of fit-for-purpose monoclonal antibodies.

Rahmad Akbar, Habib Bashour, Puneet Rawat, Philippe A Robert, Eva Smorodina, Tudor-Stefan Cotet, Karine Flem-Karlsen, Robert Frank, Brij Bhushan Mehta, Mai Ha Vu and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent advances in antibody optimization based on deep learning methods.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rahmad AkbarDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6692-0876
Habib BashourSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6660-1843
Puneet RawatDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-8081
Philippe A RobertDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1345-5015
Eva SmorodinaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5457-5163
Tudor-Stefan CotetDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7701-6225
Karine Flem-KarlsenDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8405-3406
Robert FrankDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9097-7963
Brij Bhushan MehtaDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-7076
Mai Ha VuDepartment of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9702-226X
Talip ZenginDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-4615
Jose Gutierrez-MarcosSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-9080
Fridtjof Lund-JohansenDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-1258
Jan Terje AndersenDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-1628
Victor GreiffDepartment of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-5032

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the therapeutic efficacy and commercial success of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are tremendous, the design and discovery of new candidates remain a time and cost-intensive endeavor. In this regard, progress in the generation of data describing antigen binding and developability, computational methodology, and artificial intelligence may pave the way for a new era of

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalArtificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsAntibodies, MonoclonalMachine LearningAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, Immunologicalantibodyantigenartificial intelligencedevelopabilitydrug designMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35293269
PMCPMC8928824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.