Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293122›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2022

A new technique of suturing using adhesive skin closure for uncooperative patients.

Joon-Shik Hong, Seok-Ju Yoo, Hea-Kyeong Shin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Awareness on the management strategy of stitch abscess among dental students.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joon-Shik HongDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-1435
Seok-Ju YooDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-8097
Hea-Kyeong ShinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-7104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open wounds are usually closed with suture. However, young patients often do not cooperate and prevent proper suture placement. Young patients are often terrified of mild pain and wholly uncooperative, which is why we introduce this timesaving, less painful, more aesthetic technique of placing and removing stitches. 104 patients with facial lacerations aged 5 to 15 years were treated at a single center from May 2019 to March 2021. Patients were randomly assigned equally to a simple interrupted suture group (the SI group) or a continuous locking with Steri-Strip group (the CS group). Suture times, times for stitch removal, pain scores at stitch removal and mature scar scores were evaluated. Suture and stitch removal times were significantly shorter, and pain scores at stitch removal and observer scar assessment scale scores were lower in the CS group. Patient scar assessment scale score was non-significantly lower in the SI group. This study shows that the novel continuous locking with the Steri-Strip technique is easier and quicker to perform, causes less pain when removing stitches, provides better aesthetic results than the simple interrupted suture technique and suggests the continuous locking with Steri-Strip technique would be very useful for uncooperative young patients.

Indexed as

AdhesivesCicatrixHumansPainSuturesSuture TechniquesAdhesivesadhesive surgical tapecicatrixlacerationsuture technique

Identifiers

PMID35293122
PMCPMC9615285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.